English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/4394
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 2 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título : Median age difference of references as indicator of information update of research groups. A case study in Spanish Food Research
Autor : Amat, Carlos B.; Yegros Yegros, Alfredo
Palabras clave : Citation analysis
Food science and technology
Median age difference
Fecha de publicación : 2009
Editor: Akadémiai Kiadó (Budapest)
Springer
Citación : Scientometrics 78(3): 447-465 (2009)
Resumen: Median age difference (D) is obtained by subtracting the median value of the age distribution of the references in a scientific paper from the citing half life of the journal in which it is published. As an indicator of the state of knowledge of research groups presents some interesting properties: 1) it can be related with the incorporation of information pieces in an informal way, say the rate of self-citations; it can follow the natural tendency of the groups towards a progressively updated state of knowledge, and more productive groups will tend to use more recent information. These natural hypotheses are investigated using as a case study of a medium sized Spanish institution engaged in food research. The institution scientific output comprised 439 papers published between 1999 and 2004 in SCI journals from 16 research teams. This paper analyzes teir 14,617 references. The variables studied are number of each group’s published papers, number of authors per paper, number of references per paper, type of documents cited, self citation rate and chronological range of the citations. Number of authors per paper ranged between 1 and 15. The most frequent value (N = 128) is 3 authors. Average number of authors per paper is 4,03 (SD = 1,74). Mean number of references per paper (including review papers) is 33,3 (SD= 17,39) with slightly differences between the groups. Mean self citation rate is 13.72 % (SD = 11,7). The biggest chronological range is 119 years; half of all ranges are 30 years and the general mean for this variable is 33.34 years (SD = 16.34). D values are associated with self-citation rate and we found a negative relationship between D and chronological range of references. However, the correlation figures were too small to reach any sound conclusions about the effect of these variables. Number of references per paper, number of contributing authors and number of papers published by each team were not associated with D. D values can discriminate between advanced groups working with updated information and other delayed research teams. Publication delay affects D figures. Discontinuity of research lines, heterogeneity of research fields and the short time lapse studied could have some influence on the results of this study. It is suggested that wider coverage is needed to properly evaluate the use of D values as indicators of information update of research groups.
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1993-4
URI : http://hdl.handle.net/10261/4394
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1993-4
ISSN: 0138-9130
Aparece en las colecciones: (IATA) Artículos
(INGENIO) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
ScientometricsAccepted.pdf267,57 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.