Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/118278
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPréstamo, Guadalupe-
dc.contributor.authorPedrazuela, A.-
dc.contributor.authorPeñas, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorLasunción, Miguel A.-
dc.contributor.authorArroyo, G.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-28T08:15:22Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-28T08:15:22Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00074-5-
dc.identifierissn: 0271-5317-
dc.identifier.citationNutrition Research 23: 803- 814 (2003)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/118278-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research is to assess if the buckwheat (BW) could behaves as a prebiotic and be considered as healthy food. Buckwheat is a nutritional food, rich in essential aminoacids, fatty acids, vitamins B1 and B2 and also a good source of minerals, which may produce beneficial effects on health. For our investigation, a total of twenty, 12-week-old Wistar Hannover rats was used and the animals were fed for 30 days. The body-weight was lower in the BW diet than control with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were found in the weight of the organs (liver, spleen, kidney and heart). Microbial analysis and detection were carded out on Enterobacteria, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacilus and Bifidobacteria in the rat's intestine. The results showed an increase of aerobic mesophilic and lactic acid bacteria content in the BW diet when compared to control, with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). In the BW diet, we also observed a slight decrease of Enterobectaria and less pathogenic bacteria. Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius and Bifidobacterium infantis were found in both diets, but only Lactobacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium spp and Bifidobacterium lactis were found in addition in the buckwheat diet. All these results confirm that BW could possibly be considered as a prebiotic product. Glucose content was measured in the blood. Uric acid, total protein, HDL and LDL lipids, cholesterol, triglycerides, alkaline phosphatase and mineral content were also measured in the serum. The glucose and uric acid content were similar in both diets and no significant differences were observed for the total proteins, albumin and mineral content. The alkaline phosphatase decreased in the BW diet, but no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) was found when compared to control. Buckwheat could as well be considered as a healthy food due to the diminution on total cholesterol with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) when compared to control.-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectBifidobacteria-
dc.subjectCholesterol-
dc.subjectLactobacillus-
dc.subjectPrebiotic-
dc.subjectFunctional food-
dc.subjectBuckwheat-
dc.titleRole of buckwheat diet on rats as prebiotic and healthy food-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00074-5-
dc.date.updated2015-07-28T08:15:22Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IF) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

65
checked on 22-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

61
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

665
checked on 26-abr-2024

Download(s)

148
checked on 26-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.