Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/228412
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Rubbing behavior of European brown bears: factors affecting rub tree selectivity and density

AutorGonzález-Bernardo, Enrique CSIC ORCID; Bagnasco, Carlotta; Bombieri, Giulia; Zarzo-Arias, Alejandra; Ruiz-Villar, Héctor; Morales-González, Ana; Lamamy, Cindy; Ordiz, Andrés; Cañedo, David; Díaz, Juan; Chamberlain, Daniel E; Penteriani, Vincenzo CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveChemical communication
Rub trees
Rubbing behavior
Tree selectivity
Ursus arctos
Fecha de publicación29-ene-2021
EditorOxford University Press
CitaciónJournal of Mammalogy: gyaa170 (2021)
ResumenScent-mediated communication is considered the principal communication channel in many mammal species. Compared with visual and vocal communication, odors persist for a longer time, enabling individuals to interact without being in the same place at the same time. The brown bear (Ursus arctos), like other mammals, carries out chemical communication, for example, by means of scents deposited on marking (or rub) trees. In this study, we assessed rub tree selectivity of the brown bear in the predominantly deciduous forests of the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain). We first compared the characteristics of 101 brown bear rub trees with 263 control trees. We then analyzed the potential factors affecting the density of rub trees along 35 survey routes along footpaths. We hypothesized that: (1) bears would select particular trees, or tree species, with characteristics that make them more conspicuous; and (2) that bears would select trees located in areas with the highest presence of conspecifics, depending on the population density or the position of the trees within the species’ range. We used linear models and generalized additive models to test these hypotheses. Our results showed that brown bears generally selected more conspicuous trees with a preference for birches (Betula spp.). This choice may facilitate the marking and/or detection of chemical signals and, therefore, the effectiveness of intraspecific communication. Conversely, the abundance of rub trees along footpaths did not seem to depend on the density of bear observations or their relative position within the population center or its border. Our results suggest that Cantabrian brown bears select trees based on their individual characteristics and their location, with no influence of characteristics of the bear population itself. Our findings can be used to locate target trees that could help in population monitoring.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaa170
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/228412
DOI10.1093/jmammal/gyaa170
ISSN0022-2372
E-ISSN1545-1542
Aparece en las colecciones: (INCAR) Artículos
(EBD) Artículos
(IMIB) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Rubbing_behavior_Gonzalez-Bernardo.pdf648,32 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
gyaa170_suppl_supplementary_data_s1.docxSupplementary data 113,96 kBMicrosoft Word XMLVisualizar/Abrir
gyaa170_suppl_supplementary_data_s2.docxSupplementary data 214,02 kBMicrosoft Word XMLVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

3
checked on 27-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on 24-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

185
checked on 28-abr-2024

Download(s)

173
checked on 28-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons