Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/279769
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine

AutorCappa, Eduardo P.; Chen, Charles; Klutsch, Jennifer; Sebastián Azcona, Jaime CSIC; Ratcliffe, Blaise; Wei, Xiaojing; Da Ros, Letitia; Ullah, Aziz; Liu, Yang CSIC ORCID; Benowicz, Andy; Sadoway, Shane; Mansfield, S.D.; Erbilgin, Nadir; Thomas, Barb R.; El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Palabras claveQuantitative genetic parameters
Genomic prediction
Genome wide association analyses
Single- and multiple-trait mixed models
Lodgepole pine
Fecha de publicación23-jul-2022
EditorSpringer Nature
CitaciónBMC Genomics 23: 536 (2022)
ResumenBackground Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. Results MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. Conclusions The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date.
Descripción20 páginas.- 7 figuras.- 2 tablas.- 93 referencias.- The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/279769
DOI10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7
ISSN1471-2164
Aparece en las colecciones: (IRNAS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
s12864-022-08747-7.pdf4,85 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

81
checked on 01-may-2024

Download(s)

26
checked on 01-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons