Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/279769
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCappa, Eduardo P.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorChen, Charleses_ES
dc.contributor.authorKlutsch, Jenniferes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSebastián Azcona, Jaimees_ES
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Blaisees_ES
dc.contributor.authorWei, Xiaojinges_ES
dc.contributor.authorDa Ros, Letitiaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorUllah, Azizes_ES
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yanges_ES
dc.contributor.authorBenowicz, Andyes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSadoway, Shanees_ES
dc.contributor.authorMansfield, S.D.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorErbilgin, Nadires_ES
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Barb R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorEl-Kassaby, Yousry A.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T11:32:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-23T11:32:26Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-23-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Genomics 23: 536 (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1471-2164-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/279769-
dc.description20 páginas.- 7 figuras.- 2 tablas.- 93 referencias.- The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7es_ES
dc.description.abstractBackground Genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association (GWA) analyses are currently being employed to accelerate breeding cycles and to identify alleles or genomic regions of complex traits in forest trees species. Here, 1490 interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) trees from four open-pollinated progeny trials were genotyped with 25,099 SNPs, and phenotyped for 15 growth, wood quality, pest resistance, drought tolerance, and defense chemical (monoterpenes) traits. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify genetic markers associated with these traits and determine their genetic architecture, and to compare the marker detected by single- (ST) and multiple-trait (MT) GWA models; (2) evaluate and compare the accuracy and control of bias of the genomic predictions for these traits underlying different ST and MT parametric and non-parametric GP methods. GWA, ST and MT analyses were compared using a linear transformation of genomic breeding values from the respective genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. GP, ST and MT parametric and non-parametric (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, RKHS) models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy (PA) and control of bias. Results MT-GWA analyses identified more significant associations than ST. Some SNPs showed potential pleiotropic effects. Averaging across traits, PA from the studied ST-GP models did not differ significantly from each other, with generally a slight superiority of the RKHS method. MT-GP models showed significantly higher PA (and lower bias) than the ST models, being generally the PA (bias) of the RKHS approach significantly higher (lower) than the GBLUP. Conclusions The power of GWA and the accuracy of GP were improved when MT models were used in this lodgepole pine population. Given the number of GP and GWA models fitted and the traits assessed across four progeny trials, this work has produced the most comprehensive empirical genomic study across any lodgepole pine population to date.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by Genome Canada (https://www.genomecanada. ca/) RES-FOR ID 10207, grants 16R75036 to YAE, RES0034654 to NE, and RES0031330 to BRT; Genome Alberta (https://genomealberta.ca/) RES-FORID: LRF, grants RES0034664 to NE, 16R10106 to SDM, and RES0034657 to BRT; University of Alberta/Faculty ALES/Dept RR (https://www.ualberta.ca/index. html) grant RES0034569 to BRT; Alberta Innovates – BioSolutions (https://albertainnovates.ca/) grants RES0035327 to NE, 16R75221 to SDM, and RES0028979 to BRT; Genome BC (https://www.genomebc.ca/) grants 16R75421 to YAE and 16R75546 to SDM; Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta (FRIAA, https://friaa.ab.ca/) grants RES0037021 and RES0036845 to BRT; National Science Foundation (NSF, tps://www.nsf.gov/) grants MRI-1531128, ACI-1548562, and ACI-1445606 to CC; The Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery (XSEDE, ttps://xras.xsede.org/public/requests/29304-XSEDE-MCB180177) grant MCB180177 to CC. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscriptes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectQuantitative genetic parameterses_ES
dc.subjectGenomic predictiones_ES
dc.subjectGenome wide association analyseses_ES
dc.subjectSingle- and multiple-trait mixed modelses_ES
dc.subjectLodgepole pinees_ES
dc.titleMultiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pinees_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08747-7es_ES
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.contributor.funderGenome Canadaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Albertaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderAlberta Innovates Health Solutionses_ES
dc.contributor.funderForest Resource Improvement Association of Albertaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderNational Science Foundation (US)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderExtreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (US)es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008762es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000190es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000145es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidCappa, Eduardo P. [0000-0002-6234-2263]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidChen, Charles [0000-0002-2203-0433]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidKlutsch, Jennifer [0000-0001-8839-972X]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidSebastián Azcona, Jaime [0000-0003-2819-1825]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidRatcliffe, Blaise [0000-0003-4469-2929]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidDa Ros, Letitia [0000-0002-9988-4971]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidMansfield, S.D. [0000-0002-0175-554X]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidThomas, Barb R. [0000-0002-9718-9297]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidEl-Kassaby, Yousry A. [0000-0002-4887-8977]es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IRNAS) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
s12864-022-08747-7.pdf4,85 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

81
checked on 15-may-2024

Download(s)

26
checked on 15-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons