Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/49864
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

The View from Above. Overview and Comparison of Low Cost Aerial Photographic Techniques

AutorEppich, Rand; Almagro, Antonio CSIC ORCID ; Santana, Mario; Almagro-Vidal, Ana
Palabras claveAerial photography
Conservation
Land Art
Kite Photography
Balloon Photography
Helicopters
Multi-copters
Fixed and Flexible Wing Model Aircraft
Fecha de publicación2011
EditorInternational Committee for Documentation of Cultural Heritage
CitaciónProceedings of the XXIII CIPA Symposium (2011) - Prague, Czech Republic - 12/16 September 2011
Resumen[EN] The view from above a structure, archaeological site or artwork gives conservators a unique perspective and powerful tool with which to make informed decisions. Such images can be used to create site plans, to identify boundaries, to assist in monitoring and analysis and for planning interventions. This is not new; architects, landscape architects, archaeologists, engineers, and city planners have been using aerial images from various sources for many years1. However, obtaining such images today from airplanes or helicopters can be expensive, prohibited in many locations, and are often beyond the budgets for many small projects. In addition, satellite images are often not of sufficient resolution for smaller sites, can be costly or out of date, and are usually only available vertically. Fortunately, there are alternative methods, technologies and strategies for inexpensively obtaining the ‘view from above’2,3. Many of these alternative methods are not new and some are as old as photography itself4. But recent advances in low-cost, high resolution digital cameras, higher capacity memory chips, low cost radio control systems and onboard camera and post processing software have made these techniques more accessible, affordable and efficient. These techniques are currently being investigated and most have been tested, used and taught on a variety of sites including land art, archaeological sites, mosaics, vertical murals, and complex roof structures. Simplicity, reliability and cost were key factors in the team’s investigation and testing. It was also important for the team to investigate across techniques to compare and contrast to understand the advantages and disadvantages. The scope of this paper is to give an overview, presentation and comparison, with case studies, of these techniques and platforms – poles, balloons, kites, multicopters and fixed and flexible wing remote controlled aircraft.
DescripciónWork presented at the XXIII CIPA Symposium held in Prague, Czech Republic - 12/16 September 2011, more information at http://cipa.icomos.org/index.php?id=69.
Versión del editorhttp://cipa.icomos.org/fileadmin/template/doc/PRAGUE/133.pdf
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/49864
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEA) Comunicaciones congresos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
2011CIPA.pdf305,79 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

337
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

126
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.