Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/286903
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Computational models, educational implications, and methodological innovations: The realm of visual word recognition

AutorPerea, Manuel; Marcet, Ana; Labusch, Melanie; Baciero, Ana; Fernández-López, María
Palabras claveWord recognition
Reading
Lexical decision
Methodology
Education
Fecha de publicación2023
EditorDIGITAL.CSIC
CitaciónPsicologica 44(2): e15259 (2023)
ResumenThis article aims to provide an overview of the current status of visual word recognition research, from the main models and their current challenges, to the educational and methodological implications of studies in this field. Visual word recognition is a critical reading process that connects visual sensation and perception with linguistic (sentence, text) processing. For this reason, it has captured the interest of researchers in cognitive science. Importantly, it is particularly easy to model quantitatively and researchers have developed a number of computational models to explain the processes involved. Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of corpora in several languages, including average identification times of thousands of words, allowing virtual simulations of experiments to test the predictions of theoretical models without the recruitment of participants. Nevertheless, despite the advances achieved in the understanding of word processing, models still have outstanding questions to be answered, such as the role of visual information during word recognition, or how diacritics are represented at the letter level. On the applied side, word recognition research has also contributed to the improvement of educational techniques, such as the development of friendly fonts for different populations, along with methodological innovations in cognitive psychology, such as the use of linear-mixed effects models, Bayesian methods and multi-laboratory approaches.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/15259
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/286903
DOI10.20350/digitalCSIC/15259
Reputación del trabajo revisado56
Revisiones por pares70Ver revisión de Lázaro, Miguel
70Ver revisión de Pérez-Sánchez, Miguel Á
Aparece en las colecciones: Psicológica Journal




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Perea_2023_FINAL.pdfPerea_2023_FINAL565,28 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Perea_2023_Preprint_v.02.pdfPerea_2023_Preprint_v.02865,61 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Perea_2023_Preprint_v.01.pdfPerea_2023_Preprint_v.01816,64 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender
sdgo:Goal
sdgo:Goal

La reputación del trabajo revisado es el promedio de las calificaciones de sus revisiones. Se necesitan al menos 2 revisiones, o la reputación del trabajo estará sin definir. Además, la reputación depende de la reputación de los revisores, que se obtiene de los comentarios que pueden hacer los autores sobre las revisiones recibidas. Cada vez que un trabajo recibe una nueva revisión o cada vez que una revisión recibe un nuevo comentario de autor, la reputación del trabajo revisado se recalcula. Más en Preguntas frecuentes.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on 04-may-2024

Page view(s)

498
checked on 12-may-2024

Download(s)

534
checked on 12-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons