Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/271204
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

People’s attitudes towards the agrifood system influence the value of ecosystem services of mountain agroecosystems

AutorMuñoz-Ulecia, Enrique; Bemués, Alberto; Ondé, Daniel; Ramanzín, Maurizio; Soliño, Mario CSIC ORCID; Sturaro, Enrico; Martín-Collado, Daniel
Fecha de publicación2022
EditorPublic Library of Science
CitaciónPLoS ONE 17(5): e0267799 (2022)
ResumenStudies covering the social valuation of ecosystem services (ES) are increasingly incorporating people’s attitudes, which allows social heterogeneity to be identified. This is especially relevant in mountain areas, where diverse complex interactions occur among the environment, the socioeconomic system, and a wide variety of farming practices. In this context, we aimed to: (i) identify the attitudinal dimensions that build people views about the agrifood system; and (ii) analyse how these attitudinal dimensions influence the value given to ES delivered by mountain agroecosystems of two European countries. We conducted a survey with a sample of 1008 individuals evenly distributed in the Italian Alps and Spanish Mediterranean mountain areas to collect information on people’s attitudes toward: (i) the economy and the environment; (ii) rural development and agricultural intensification; (iii) food quality, production, and consumption; and (iv) agricultural and environmental policies. The survey included a choice experiment to assess the value that individuals attach to the most relevant ES provided by mountain agroecosystems in these areas (i.e., landscape, biodiversity, quality local products, wildfires prevention and water quality). The results showed four common attitudinal dimensions, namely Economy over environment, Mass-Market distribution reliability, Agricultural productivism, and Environmentalism and rural lifestyle. These attitudinal dimensions resulted in six groups of respondents. Most groups positively valued an increase in the delivery of all the analysed ES, which suggests that agricultural policies which aim to promote ES are likely to receive social support in the study areas. However, the differing attitudinal dimensions underlying people’s preferences may result in disagreements about the steps to be taken to achieve the desired increase in ES delivery
Descripción17 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables.-- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0267799
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/271204
DOI10.1371/journal. pone.0267799
E-ISSN1932-6203
Aparece en las colecciones: (IIM) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Peoples_attitudes_OA_2022.pdf1,21 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

31
checked on 27-abr-2024

Download(s)

19
checked on 27-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons