Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/98015
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Technical note: Comparison of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to assess bacterial diversity in the rumen of sheep

AutorSaro Higuera, Cristina CSIC ORCID; Ranilla, María José CSIC ORCID ; Cifuentes, A.; Rosselló-Mora, Ramón CSIC ORCID; Carro Travieso, Mª Dolores CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveAutomated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
Forage
Postfeeding time
Ruminal bacteria
Sheep
Fecha de publicaciónmar-2014
EditorAmerican Society of Animal Science
CitaciónJournal of Animal Science 92(3) : 2014
ResumenThe aim of this study was to compare automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques to assess bacterial diversity in the rumen of sheep. Sheep were fed 2 diets with 70% of either alfalfa hay or grass hay, and the solid (SOL) and liquid (LIQ) phases of the rumen were sampled immediately before feeding (0 h) and at 4 and 8 h postfeeding. Both techniques detected similar differences between forages, with alfalfa hay promoting greater (P < 0.05) bacterial diversity than grass hay. In contrast, whereas ARISA analysis showed a decrease (P < 0.05) of bacterial diversity in SOL at 4 h postfeeding compared with 0 and 8 h samplings, no variations (P > 0.05) over the postfeeding period were detected by DGGE. The ARISA technique showed lower (P < 0.05) bacterial diversity in SOL than in LIQ samples at 4 h postfeeding, but no differences (P > 0.05) in bacterial diversity between both rumen phases were detected by DGGE. Under the conditions of this study, the DGGE was not sensitive enough to detect some changes in ruminal bacterial communities, and therefore ARISA was considered more accurate for assessing bacterial diversity of ruminal samples. The results highlight the influence of the fingerprinting technique used to draw conclusions on factors affecting ruminal bacterial diversity.
Descripción6 páginas.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2013-7175
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/98015
DOI10.2527/jas2013-7175
ISSN0021-8812
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGM) Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Embargo. Digital.CSIC..pdf21,67 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

292
checked on 22-may-2024

Download(s)

201
checked on 22-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.