Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/98015
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Technical note: Comparison of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to assess bacterial diversity in the rumen of sheep |
Autor: | Saro Higuera, Cristina CSIC ORCID; Ranilla, María José CSIC ORCID ; Cifuentes, A.; Rosselló-Mora, Ramón CSIC ORCID; Carro Travieso, Mª Dolores CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis Forage Postfeeding time Ruminal bacteria Sheep |
Fecha de publicación: | mar-2014 | Editor: | American Society of Animal Science | Citación: | Journal of Animal Science 92(3) : 2014 | Resumen: | The aim of this study was to compare automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques to assess bacterial diversity in the rumen of sheep. Sheep were fed 2 diets with 70% of either alfalfa hay or grass hay, and the solid (SOL) and liquid (LIQ) phases of the rumen were sampled immediately before feeding (0 h) and at 4 and 8 h postfeeding. Both techniques detected similar differences between forages, with alfalfa hay promoting greater (P < 0.05) bacterial diversity than grass hay. In contrast, whereas ARISA analysis showed a decrease (P < 0.05) of bacterial diversity in SOL at 4 h postfeeding compared with 0 and 8 h samplings, no variations (P > 0.05) over the postfeeding period were detected by DGGE. The ARISA technique showed lower (P < 0.05) bacterial diversity in SOL than in LIQ samples at 4 h postfeeding, but no differences (P > 0.05) in bacterial diversity between both rumen phases were detected by DGGE. Under the conditions of this study, the DGGE was not sensitive enough to detect some changes in ruminal bacterial communities, and therefore ARISA was considered more accurate for assessing bacterial diversity of ruminal samples. The results highlight the influence of the fingerprinting technique used to draw conclusions on factors affecting ruminal bacterial diversity. | Descripción: | 6 páginas. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2013-7175 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/98015 | DOI: | 10.2527/jas2013-7175 | ISSN: | 0021-8812 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IGM) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Embargo. Digital.CSIC..pdf | 21,67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
292
checked on 22-may-2024
Download(s)
201
checked on 22-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.