Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/345612
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri×V. rupestris)

AutorFlexas, Jaume; Barón Ayala, Matilde CSIC ORCID; Bota, Josefina; Ducruet, Jean-Marc; Gallé, Alexander; Galmés, Jeroni; Jiménez, Miguel; Pou, Alicia CSIC ORCID; Ribas-Carbó, Miquel; Sajnani, Carlota; Tomàs, Magdalena CSIC; Medrano, Hipólito
Palabras claveDrought
Mesophyll conductance
Photochemistry
Photosynthetic limitations
Stomatal conductance
Rubisco
Thermoluminescence
Water stress
Fecha de publicaciónmay-2009
EditorOxford University Press
CitaciónJournal of Experimental Botany 60(8). 2361-2377 (2009)
ResumenThe hybrid Richter-110 (Vitis berlandieri×Vitis rupestris) has the reputation of being a genotype strongly adapted to drought. A study was performed with plants of R-110 subjected to sustained water-withholding to induce acclimation to two different levels of water stress, followed by rewatering to induce recovery. The goal was to analyse how photosynthesis is regulated during acclimation to water stress and recovery. In particular, the regulation of stomatal conductance (gs), mesophyll conductance to CO2 (gm), leaf photochemistry (chlorophyll fluorescence and thermoluminescence), and biochemistry (Vc,max) were assessed. During water stress, gs declined to 0.1 and less than 0.05 mol CO2 m−2 s−1 in moderately and severely water-stressed plants, respectively, and was kept quite constant during an acclimation period of 1-week. Leaf photochemistry proved to be very resistant to the applied water-stress conditions. By contrast, gm and Vc,max were affected by water stress, but they were not kept constant during the acclimation period. gm was initially unaffected by water stress, and Vc,max even increased above control values. However, after several days of acclimation to water stress, both parameters declined below (gm) or at (Vc,max) control values. For the latter two parameters there seemed to be an interaction between water stress and cumulative irradiance, since both recovered to control values after several cloudy days despite water stress. A photosynthesis limitation analysis revealed that diffusional limitations and not biochemical limitations accounted for the observed decline in photosynthesis during water stress and slow recovery after rewatering, both in moderately and severely stressed plants. However, the relative contribution of stomatal (SL) and mesophyll conductance (MCL) limitations changes during acclimation to water stress, from predominant SL early during water stress to similar SL and MCL after acclimation. Finally, photosynthesis recovery after rewatering was mostly limited by SL, since stomatal closure recovered much more slowly than gm.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp069
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/345612
DOI10.1093/jxb/erp069
ISSN0022-0957
E-ISSN1460-2431
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEZ) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

298
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

276
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

37
checked on 27-abr-2024

Download(s)

11
checked on 27-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.