Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/286724
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Endocarp Development Study in Full Irrigated Olive Orchards and Impact on Fruit Features at Harvest

AutorSánchez-Piñero M.; Martín Palomo, Mª José; Moriana, Alfonso CSIC ORCID; Corell González, M.; Pérez-López, D.
Palabras claveFruit dry weight
Fruit growth
Fruit size
Pit hardening
Pit-breaking pressure
Fecha de publicacióndic-2022
EditorMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitaciónPlants 11(24): 3541 (2022)
ResumenEndocarp development in olive trees includes three periods: growth (Period I), massive sclerification (Period II) and maximum hardening (Period III). The two first are strongly related to yield and irrigation management. Period I was reported to coincide with mesocarp cell division and thus with final fruit size. Period II was considered to be the most drought-resistant phenological stage. However, little is known in olive trees about the length of these periods and their capacity for predicting fruit size at harvest. The aim of this work was to evaluate the length of both periods in different cultivars and different location of full irrigated orchards. We also aimed to study the fruit feature impact on harvest at the end of Period I. Data from full irrigated olive orchards of cv Cornicabra, Arbequina and Manzanilla in two different locations (Ciudad Real, Central Spain, and Seville, South Spain) were used. The pattern of pit-breaking pressure throughout the season was measured with fruit samples for several years (2006 to 2022). These data and climatic data were used to compare different estimation methods for the length of Period I and II of endocarp development. Then, fruit volume and dry weight at the end of Period I were used to estimate fruit features at harvest. Results suggest that the Period I length was less temperature- and cultivar-dependent than expected. The duration of this period was almost constant at around 49 days after full bloom. Thermal time was negatively correlated with fruit size at the end of Period I. On the contrary, a lineal thermal model presented the lowest variability when estimating the Period II length, which was also affected by the cultivar. The best fit between fruit dry weight and volume at Period I vs. harvest was unique for oil cultivars (Cornicabra and Arbequina), while cv Manzanilla presented a different relationship. A temperature increase in the future would not affect the Period I length but would reduce the fruit size at the end of this period and at harvest. © 2022 by the authors.
Descripción18 páginas.- 6 figuras.- 7 tablas.- 40 referenicas.- (This article belongs to the Section Crop Physiology and Crop Production)
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11243541
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/286724
DOI10.3390/plants11243541
E-ISSN2223-7747
Aparece en las colecciones: (IRNAS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
plants-11-03541.pdf2,45 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender
sdgo:Goal
sdgo:Goal

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on 28-abr-2024

Page view(s)

53
checked on 02-may-2024

Download(s)

29
checked on 02-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons