Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/279366
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

On Dropsonde Surface-Adjusted Winds and Their Use for the Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer Wind Speed Calibration

AutorPolverari, Federica CSIC ORCID; Sapp, Joe; Portabella, Marcos CSIC ORCID ; Stoffelen, Ad; Jelenak, Zorana; Chang, Paul
Palabras claveCalibration
Dropsondes
Microwave radiometry
Ocean surface high and extreme wind reference
Tropical cyclones
Fecha de publicaciónjul-2022
EditorInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
CitaciónIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60: 4208308 (2022)
ResumenThe airborne stepped frequency microwave radiometer (SFMR) provides the measurements of 10-m ocean surface wind speed in high and extreme wind conditions. These winds are calibrated using the surface-adjusted wind estimates from the so-called dropsondes. The surface-adjusted winds are obtained from layer-averaged winds scaled to 10-m altitude to eliminate the local surface variability not associated with the storm strength. The SFMR measurements and, consequently, the surface-adjusted dropsonde winds represent a possible reference for satellite instrument and model calibration/validation at high and extreme wind conditions. To this end, representativeness errors that those measurements may introduce need to be taken into account to ensure that the storm variability is correctly resolved in satellite retrievals and modeling. In this work, we compare the SFMR winds with the dropsonde surface-adjusted winds derived from the so-called WL150 algorithm, which uses the lowest 150-m layer between 10 and 350 m. We use nine years of data from 2009 to 2017. We focus on the effects of the layer altitude and thickness. Our analysis shows that the layer altitude has a significant impact on dropsonde/SFMR wind comparisons. Moreover, the averaged winds obtained from layers thinner than the nominal 150 m and closer to the surface are more representative of the SFMR surface wind speed than the WL150 speeds. We also find that the surface-adjusted winds are more representative of 10-km horizontally averaged SFMR winds. We conclude that for calibration/validation purposes, the WL150 algorithm can introduce noise, and the use of actual 10-m dropsonde measurements should be further investigated
Descripción8 pages, 7 figures
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3189310
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/279366
DOI10.1109/TGRS.2022.3189310
ISSN0196-2892
E-ISSN1558-0644
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICM) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato Existing users please Login
Polverari_et_al_2022_postprint.pdf3,94 MBAdobe PDFEmbargoed until 31 de agosto de 2024    Petición de una copia
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on 23-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on 21-feb-2024

Page view(s)

58
checked on 30-abr-2024

Download(s)

3
checked on 30-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.