English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/18635
Title: Comparison of SSR polymorphisms using automated capillary sequencers, and polyacrylamide and agarose gel electrophoresis: Implications for the assessment of genetic diversity and relatedness in almond
Authors: Sánchez-Pérez, Raquel; Ballester, Jordi; Dicenta, Federico; Arús, Pere ; Martínez-Gómez, Pedro
Keywords: Prunus
Molecular markers
Genetic relationships
Issue Date: 8-May-2006
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Scientia Horticulturae 108(3): 310-316 (2006)
Abstract: In this work we have performed a comparative study of the utilization of three electrophoresis separation methods for the analysis of peach SSR polymorphism in almond and its implications in the assessment of genetic diversity and relatedness. Automated SSR detection and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were the most efficient methods and would be able to resolve allelic variation at a finer scale than the electrophoresis in MetaPhor® agarose. Moreover, automated electrophoresis detection is much more expensive in terms of cost of equipment and cost of the analysis. In addition, SSR detection using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed similar results than automated sequencing, although it is more time-consuming and toxic than electrophoresis in agarose gels. Discrepancies among polyacrylamide and automated capillary, and MetaPhor® were observed when differences in SSR polymorphisms were between 1 and 5 bp. While the use of MetaPhor® agarose appears less indicated for genotype characterization, this technique may be the most convenient in other applications, i.e. mapping of population, due to its lower cost and easier routine application. The utilization MetaPhor® agarose produced a slightly different clustering of genotypes in spite of the big differences observed in the DNA fingerprinting. However, bootstrap values using MetaPhor® agarose were lower indicating a lower accuracy of this SSR polymorphism analysis method.
Description: 7 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables.
Publisher version (URL): http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.004
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/18635
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.004
ISSN: 0304-4238
Appears in Collections:(CEBAS) Artículos
(CRAG) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.