Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/166744
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Field detection of anthracnose crown rot in strawberry using spectroscopy technology

AutorLu, Jinzhu; Ehsani, Reza; Shi, Yeyin; Abdulridha, Jaafar; Castro, Ana Isabel de CSIC ORCID; Xu, Yunjun
Palabras claveStrawberry
Anthracnose crown rot
Colletotrichum
Hyperspectral
Vegetation indices
Disease detection
Fecha de publicación1-abr-2017
EditorElsevier
CitaciónComputers and Electronics in Agriculture 135: 289-299 (2017)
ResumenAnthracnose crown rot (ACR) is one of the major diseases affecting strawberry crops grown in warm climates and causes huge yield losses each year. ACR is caused by the fungus Colletotrichum. Since this airborne disease spreads rapidly, detection at the early stage of infection is critical. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of detecting ACR in strawberry at its early stage under field conditions using spectroscopy technology. Hyperspectral data were collected in-field using a mobile platform on three categories of strawberry plants: infected but asymptomatic, infected and symptomatic, and healthy. As a comparison, indoor data were also collected from the same three categories of strawberry plants under a controlled laboratory setup. Three classification models, stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA), Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA), and the k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithms, were investigated for their potential to differentiate the three infestation categories. Thirty-three spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) were calculated as inputs using selected spectral bands in the visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) regions to train classification models. The mean classification accuracies of in-field tests for the three infestation categories were 71.3%, 70.5%, and 73.6% for SDA, FDA, and kNN, respectively. These accuracies were approximately 15–20% lower than those of the indoor tests. The low accuracy (15.4%) of classifying healthy leaves in-field using the kNN model was possibly due to the training datasets being unbalanced. After the adjustment of sample sizes of each category, the accuracies of kNN improved greatly, especially for the healthy and symptomatic categories. Overall, SDA was the optimal classifier for both indoor and in-field tests for detection strawberry ACR. However, kNN performed better for asymptomatic leaves in the field in the case of balanced sample sizes of each category.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.017
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/166744
DOI10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.017
ISSN0168-1699
Aparece en las colecciones: (IAS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
checked on 29-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

43
checked on 27-feb-2024

Page view(s)

263
checked on 30-abr-2024

Download(s)

106
checked on 30-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.