Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/166739
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Field characterization of field capacity and root zone available water capacity for variable rate irrigation

AutorLo, Tsz Him; Heeren, Derek; Mateos, Luciano CSIC ORCID ; Luck, Joe D.; Martin, Derrel L.; Miller, Keith A.; Barker, J. Burdette; Shaver, Tim M.
Palabras claveAvailable water capacity
Electrical conductivity
Field capacity
Permanent wilting point
Spatial variability
Variable rate irrigation
Fecha de publicación2017
EditorAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
CitaciónApplied Engineering in Agriculture 33(4): 559-572 (2017)
ResumenAccurate spatial characterization of field capacity (FC) and root zone available water capacity (R) can enhance site-specific management practices—such as variable rate irrigation—to lower input costs, reduce contaminant leaching, and/or improve crop yield. Measuring the volumetric water content after wet soils drain following substantial precipitation can provide a field estimate of FC. The average FC (FCa) for the managed root zone was determined at thirty-two locations in a topographically variable field in south central Nebraska. The difference between FC and permanent wilting point estimates—computed using a pedotransfer function—yielded values for R for the observation locations. Sampling locations were too sparse for reliable interpolation across the field. Therefore, relationships between a surrogate, or predictor, variable and soil water properties were used to provide spatial distributions of FC and R for the field. Field estimates of FCa and R were more strongly correlated to elevation (correlation coefficient, r = -0.77 and -0.76, respectively) than to deep soil apparent electrical conductivity (r = -0.46 and -0.39, respectively). Comparing maps of FCa and R from gSSURGO to maps from field characterization yielded a root mean squared difference of 0.031 m3 m-3 for FCa and 34 mm for R. Sampling seven locations across the elevation range in this field produced FCa and R prediction functions that achieved 95% and 87%, respectively, of the reduction in the standard error achievable with a larger number of sampling locations. Spatial characterization of FCa and R depends on identifying a suitable predictor variable(s) based on field knowledge and available spatial data. Well-chosen variables may allow satisfactory predictions using several sampling locations that are distributed over the entire field. Ultimately, the costs and benefits of spatial characterization should be considered when evaluating site-specific water management.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aea.11963
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/166739
DOI10.13031/aea.11963
ISSN0883-8542
Aparece en las colecciones: (IAS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on 07-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

283
checked on 06-may-2024

Download(s)

96
checked on 06-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.