English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/85058
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion

AuthorsCastillo, Carlos ; Pérez Alcántara, Rafael; James, Michael R.; Quinton, J. N.; Taguas, E. V.; Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
Issue DateJul-2012
PublisherSoil Science Society of America
CitationSoil Science Society of America Journal 76(4): 1319-1332 (2012)
AbstractMost field erosion studies in agricultural areas provide little information on the probable errors involved. Here, for the first time, we compare the accuracy, time and cost of conventional and new methodologies for gully surveying, and provide a model to estimate the effort required to achieve a specified accuracy. Using a terrestrial LiDAR survey of a 7.1-m-long gully reach as a benchmark data set, the accuracies of different measurement methods (a new 3D photo-reconstruction technique, total station, laser profilemeter, and pole) are assessed for estimating gully erosion at a reach scale. Based on further field measurements performed over nine gullies (>100 m long), a simulation approach is derived to model the expected volume errors when 2D methods are used at the gully scale. All gullies considered were located near Cordoba, Spain. At the reach scale, the field measurements using 3D photo-reconstruction and total station techniques produced cross-sectional area error values smaller than 4%, with other 2D methods exceeding 10%. For volume estimation, photo-reconstruction proved similar to LiDAR data, but 2D methods generated large negative volume error (E V) values (<-13% for laser profilemeter and pole). We show that the proposed error expressions derived from the model are in line with the reach-scale field results. A measurement distance factor (MDF) is defined that represents the ratio between cross-section distance and the gully length, and thus reflects relative survey effort. We calculate the required MDF for specified values of E V, illustrating how MDF decreases with increasing gully length and sinuosity. © Soil Science Society of America.
Identifiersdoi: 10.2136/sssaj2011.0390
issn: 0361-5995
e-issn: 1435-0661
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.