Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/60316
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCardona, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Nin, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Stephen G.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-15T11:58:12Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-15T11:58:12Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.09.026-
dc.identifierissn: 0165-7836-
dc.identifier.citationFisheries Research 106: 575- 578 (2010)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/60316-
dc.description.abstractDespite the reliance on angler cooperation and engagement in many fisheries assessment techniques (e.g., log-books, interviews, catch and effort reporting, reporting tagged fish, etc.), there have been few studies aimed at understanding how to increase levels of cooperation and communication between scientists and anglers. In the ROQUER research project, 3000 fish Coris julis, Diplodus annularis and Serranus scriba) were externally tagged with conventional t-tags inserted below the dorsal fin. A communication program involving TV and radio broadcasts, leaflets, lectures and organization of angling tournaments, was subsequently undertaken to inform anglers about the project and encourage them to return tagged fish. To evaluate the effectiveness of the different communication methods we conducted a face to face survey of 103 anglers in Palma Bay. Results revealed that 36% of fishers were aware of the research project and what they should do if they caught a tagged fish. Most anglers who knew about the project learned about it through either word of mouth (57%), leaflets (46%), or presentations made by the project team at fishing competitions (30%). Of the 23 anglers who returned tagged fish to the project, 18 (78%) had heard about the project through fishing competitions and 5 (22%) were aware of the project through leaflets. To be successful, fish tagging studies must allocate sufficient resources to informing and engaging with the recreational fishing community. © 2010 Elsevier B.V.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.titleScientists and recreational fishers: Communication manners and its efficiency-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fishres.2010.09.026-
dc.date.updated2012-11-15T11:58:12Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IMEDEA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on 26-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

316
checked on 27-may-2024

Download(s)

103
checked on 27-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.