Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/49690
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Linking cost efficiency evaluation with population viability analysis to prioritize wetland bird conservation actions |
Autor: | Sebastián-González, Esther CSIC ORCID; Sánchez-Zapata, José A.; Botella, Francisco; Figuerola, Jordi CSIC ORCID ; Hiraldo, Fernando CSIC ORCID; Wintle, Brendan A. | Palabras clave: | Conservation planning Efficiency Prioritization Risk assessment Threat status Uncertainty Cost-benefit |
Fecha de publicación: | sep-2011 | Editor: | Elsevier | Citación: | Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 2354–2361 | Resumen: | Prioritizing management actions for wildlife conservation is a difficult task due to the large number of problems relative to available conservation resources and uncertainty about the benefits arising from numerous potential management actions. In this study we use a cost-efficiency protocol to evaluate and prioritize eight different management actions for waterbird community in wetlands throughout southeastern Spain. The protocol generated an action priority ranking based on the costs and predicted benefits of the actions in terms of waterbird carrying capacity. Action prioritization outcomes were also evaluated using population viability analysis models for two of the study species. Removal of dead bird carcasses to prevent disease outbreaks was identified as the most cost efficient action. Removing lead pel- lets from the sediment was the least efficient strategy. Our approach highlights the role of detailed risk assessment as a form of quality control on the simpler prioritization protocols. We recommend a two- step prioritization protocol based on (i) a rapid, usually simpler prioritization approach for the bulk of species or values being managed, and (ii) a more sophisticated risk assessment for a subset of the species of interest for which detailed risk assessments are tractable. This process strikes a balance between sophistication and practicality. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.015 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/49690 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.015 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (EBD) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
conbiol12.doc | 939,5 kB | Microsoft Word | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
23
checked on 23-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
21
checked on 25-feb-2024
Page view(s)
409
checked on 23-abr-2024
Download(s)
296
checked on 23-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.