Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/355227
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Hydrothermal carbonization vs. anaerobic digestion to valorize fruit and vegetable waste: A comparative technical and energy assessment

AutorMetyouy, Khadija; González, Rubén CSIC ORCID; Gómez, Xiomar; González-Arias, Judith; Martínez, E. Judith; Chafik, Tarik; Sánchez, Marta E.; Cara-Jiménez, Jorge
Palabras claveAnaerobic digestion (AD)
Energy recovery
Hydrochar
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)
Vegetable and fruit waste (VFW)
Tesauro UNESCOhttp://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept640
Fecha de publicación1-jun-2023
EditorElsevier
CitaciónJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11(3): 109925 (2023)
ResumenHerein, the valorization of vegetable and fruit waste was assessed via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and anaerobic digestion (AD) in terms of product characterization and energy requirements. HTC was conducted at reaction temperatures between 150 ºC and 190 ºC, and residence times between 20 min and 40 min. The increase in the process severity resulted in hydrochars with higher carbon contents and higher energy densification ratios. AD was performed in two different ways. i.e., batch and semi-continuous reactions. From the batch experiments a methane yield of 300 L CH4/kg VS was obtained, while for the semi-continuous, the average specific methane production estimated (for HRTs from 75 to 50 days) was 213 ± 32 L CH4/kg VS. To estimate the energy requirements, mass and energy balances were performed considering the basic stages of each process to obtain a suitable biofuel material. In this sense, it was concluded that for this specific waste, AD was a more suitable process with a positive energy net balance. On the contrary, HTC presented a negative energy net balance being required 1.29 MJ/kg of fresh food waste. A combined HTC-AD treatment may be an efficient method to take advantage of both technologies leading to higher energy efficiencies and other valuable products.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109925
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/355227
DOI10.1016/j.jece.2023.109925
ISSN2213-2929
E-ISSN2213-3437
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICMS) Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato Existing users please Login
HTC vs. AD.pdfHydrothermal carbonization vs. anaerobic digestion to valorize fruit and vegetable waste: A comparative technical and energy assessment2,12 MBAdobe PDFEmbargoed until 1 de junio de 2025    Petición de una copia
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

21
checked on 19-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.