Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/355227
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Hydrothermal carbonization vs. anaerobic digestion to valorize fruit and vegetable waste: A comparative technical and energy assessment |
Autor: | Metyouy, Khadija; González, Rubén CSIC ORCID; Gómez, Xiomar; González-Arias, Judith; Martínez, E. Judith; Chafik, Tarik; Sánchez, Marta E.; Cara-Jiménez, Jorge | Palabras clave: | Anaerobic digestion (AD) Energy recovery Hydrochar Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) Vegetable and fruit waste (VFW) |
Tesauro UNESCO: | http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept640 | Fecha de publicación: | 1-jun-2023 | Editor: | Elsevier | Citación: | Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11(3): 109925 (2023) | Resumen: | Herein, the valorization of vegetable and fruit waste was assessed via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and anaerobic digestion (AD) in terms of product characterization and energy requirements. HTC was conducted at reaction temperatures between 150 ºC and 190 ºC, and residence times between 20 min and 40 min. The increase in the process severity resulted in hydrochars with higher carbon contents and higher energy densification ratios. AD was performed in two different ways. i.e., batch and semi-continuous reactions. From the batch experiments a methane yield of 300 L CH4/kg VS was obtained, while for the semi-continuous, the average specific methane production estimated (for HRTs from 75 to 50 days) was 213 ± 32 L CH4/kg VS. To estimate the energy requirements, mass and energy balances were performed considering the basic stages of each process to obtain a suitable biofuel material. In this sense, it was concluded that for this specific waste, AD was a more suitable process with a positive energy net balance. On the contrary, HTC presented a negative energy net balance being required 1.29 MJ/kg of fresh food waste. A combined HTC-AD treatment may be an efficient method to take advantage of both technologies leading to higher energy efficiencies and other valuable products. | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109925 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/355227 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109925 | ISSN: | 2213-2929 | E-ISSN: | 2213-3437 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (ICMS) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | Existing users please Login |
---|---|---|---|---|
HTC vs. AD.pdf | Hydrothermal carbonization vs. anaerobic digestion to valorize fruit and vegetable waste: A comparative technical and energy assessment | 2,12 MB | Adobe PDF | Embargoed until 1 de junio de 2025 Petición de una copia |
CORE Recommender
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.