Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/353465
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Vertebral osteomyelitis after spine instrumentation surgery: risk factors and management

AutorBenavent, Eva; Kortajarena, Xabier; Sobrino-Díaz, Beatriz; Gasch, Oriol; Rodríguez-Pardo, Dolors; Escudero-Sánchez, Rosa; Bahamonde, Alberto; Rodriguez-Montserrat, David; García-País, María José; Toro, María Dolores del CSIC ORCID; Sorlí, Luisa; Nodar, Andrés; Vilchez, Helem H.; Muñez, Elena; Iribarren, José A.; Ariza, Javier; Murillo, Óscar; Group for the Study of Osteoarticular Infections – Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC)
Palabras clavePost-surgical vertebral osteomyelitis
Infection after spine instrumentation
Device-related infections
Orthopaedic surgery
Bone and joint infections
Fecha de publicaciónoct-2023
EditorElsevier
CitaciónJournal of Hospital Infection 140: 102-109 (2023)
Resumen[Background] Vertebral osteomyelitis after spine instrumentation surgery (pVOM) is a rare complication. Most cases of infection occur early after surgery that involve skin and soft tissue and can be managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).
[Aim] To identify pVOM risk factors and evaluate management strategies.
[Methods] From a multicentre cohort of deep infection after spine instrumentation (IASI) cases (2010–2016), pVOM cases were compared with those without vertebral involvement. Early and late infections were defined (<60 days and >60 days after surgery, respectively). Multivariate analysis was used to explore risk factors.
[Findings] Among 410 IASI cases, 19 (4.6%) presented with pVOM, ranging from 2% (7/347) in early to 19.1% (12/63) in late IASIs. After multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.18), interbody fusion (aOR: 6.96; 95% CI: 2–24.18) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infection (aOR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.01–14.53) remained independent risk factors for pVOM. Cases with pVOM had worse prognoses than those without (failure rate; 26.3% vs 10.8%; P = 0.038). Material removal was the preferred strategy (57.9%), mainly in early cases, without better outcomes (failure rate; 33.3% vs 50% compared with DAIR). Late cases managed with removal had greater success compared with DAIR (failure rate; 0% vs 40%; P = 0.067).
[Conclusion] Risk factors for pVOM are old age, use of interbody fusion devices and CoNS aetiology. Although the diagnosis leads to a worse prognosis, material withdrawn should be reserved for late cases or when spinal fusion is achieved.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2023.07.008
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/353465
DOI10.1016/j.jhin.2023.07.008
ISSN0195-6701
E-ISSN1532-2939
Aparece en las colecciones: (IBIS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf59,24 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on 16-may-2024

Page view(s)

11
checked on 16-may-2024

Download(s)

2
checked on 16-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.