Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/345588
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Integration of landslide hazard into urban planning across Europe

AutorMateos Ruiz, Rosa María; López-Vinielles, Juan; Poyiadji, Eleftheria; Tsagkas, Dimetrios; Sheehy, Michael; Hadjicharalambous, Kleopas; Liščák, Pavel; Podolski, Laszlo; Laskowicz, Izabela; Iadanza, Carla; Gauert, Christoph; Todorović, Saša; Auflič, Mateja Jemec; Maftei, Raluca; Hermanns, Reginald L.; Kociu, Arben; Sandić, Cvjetko; Mauter, Rike; Sarro Trigueros, Roberto; Béjar Pizarro, Marta; Herrera García, Gerardo
Palabras claveEuroGeoSurveys
Europe
Landslides
Legislation
Urban planning
Fecha de publicación1-abr-2020
EditorElsevier
CitaciónLandscape and Urban Planning 196: 103740 (2020)
Resumen[EN] An enquiry-based and participatory analysis approach is carried out to identify the strengths and weaknesses in the heterogeneous legislations across Europe that regulate the integration of landslide hazard into urban planning. Twenty one national and eight regional Geological Surveys (GSs) have participated in the analysis. The GSs report almost 4000 recent (2015–2017) damaging landslides events resulting in 39 fatalities and 155 injuries, destruction to housing, infrastructure and properties. In addition, 11 countries report 18 MORLE events over the past 10 years responsible for 150 fatalities and severe economic impacts. Results also reveal almost 48 million people living in areas with high and very high degrees of landslide-susceptibility (around 1 million km2 according to ELSUS v2). This work shows that almost half the participating countries (10 countries) have no legal guidance in the National Land Bill to stipulate consideration of landslides in urban planning practices, and mapping tools are often not adapted to a standard required to inform sustainable development. Furthermore, there is a wide range of laws and a large heterogeneity of mapping methods, scales and procedures. A relevant deficiency detected in many countries is the lack of landslide maps at a detailed resolution for urban planning. Additionally, some case studies of suboptimal urban development practices in areas of known instability have been discussed; they are found to be related to weak rule of law and/or absence of good governance. This paper shows inconsistencies across Europe in the handling of landslides and proposes a series of key actions to improve this situation, highlighting the need for a common regulatory framework to deal with this geohazard appropriately.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103740
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/345588
DOI10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103740
ISSN0169-2046
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGME) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdfNo descargable59,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender
sdgo:Goal

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

47
checked on 18-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
checked on 27-feb-2024

Page view(s)

13
checked on 21-may-2024

Download(s)

2
checked on 21-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.