Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/342925
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSancho-Knapik, Domingoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Sánchez, Rubénes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Forn, Davides_ES
dc.contributor.authorPeguero-Pina, José Javieres_ES
dc.contributor.authorFerrio, Juan Pedroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGil-Pelegrín, Eustaquioes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T09:53:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-19T09:53:11Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-
dc.identifier.citationSancho-Knapik D, Martín-Sánchez R, Alonso-Forn D, Peguero-Pina JJ, Ferrio JP, Gil-Pelegrín E. Trade-offs among leaf toughness, constitutive chemical defense, and growth rates in oaks are influenced by the level of leaf mass per area. Annals of Forest Science 80: 39 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1286-4560-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/342925-
dc.description10 Pags.- 4 Figs. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.es_ES
dc.description.abstractKey message Among the variety of leaf defensive strategies to counteract herbivory attacks, the oak species analyzed in this study maximize investment in no more than one, with high-LMA oaks developing very tough leaves and low-LMA oaks favoring between high concentrations of condensed tannins or high growth rates. Context Plants develop a variety of defense strategies to counteract herbivory attacks, from physical and chemical defenses to tolerance strategies. Tradeoffs between strategies have been widely assessed from a resource allocation perspective, but there is a need to consider eventual interactions among them. Aim We evaluate the among-species tradeoff between three main constitutive plant defense traits, while considering the leaf mass per area ratio (LMA) as a proxy of leaf construction investment on area basis. Methods Leaf toughness measured as work of fracture, condensed tannins, and relative growth rate (RGR) were analyzed in a set of 19 Quercus L. species with contrasting LMA. Results Most species had low values either in two or in the three traits analyzed. Moreover, the highest values of work of fracture appeared in the species with high LMA; the highest values of condensed tannins were found in the species with the lowest LMA; and high values of RGR were measured in species with intermediate or lower values of LMA. Conclusion Oaks showed a trade-off among leaf defensive strategies influenced by LMA. Oaks with high LMA developed very tough leaves while oaks with low LMA presented lower values of toughness but favored between one of the two other strategies.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by grant CNS2022‑136156 funded by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and European Union Next Generation EU/ PRTR, by grant PID2019‑106701RR‑I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and by Gobierno de Aragón S74_23R research group. Work of R.M‑S. is supported by a predoctoral Gobierno de Aragón scholarship. Work of DA‑F was supported by an INIA contract BES‑2017–081208.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectCondensed tanninses_ES
dc.subjectDefensive traitses_ES
dc.subjectRelative growth ratees_ES
dc.subjectQuercuses_ES
dc.subjectWork of fracturees_ES
dc.titleTrade-offs among leaf toughness, constitutive chemical defense, and growth rates in oaks are influenced by the level of leaf mass per areaes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13595-023-01204-9-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-023-01204-9es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1297-966X-
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigación (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissiones_ES
dc.contributor.funderGobierno de Aragónes_ES
dc.contributor.funderCSIC - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011033es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100010067es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidGil-Pelegrín, Eustaquio [0000-0002-4053-6681]es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
dc.subject.sdgProtect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity losses_ES
dc.subject.agrovochttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6409es_ES
dc.subject.agrovochttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374158672853es_ES
dc.subject.unescohttp://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept11063es_ES
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Gil-PelegrinE_AnnForestSci_2023.pdf1,77 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

19
checked on 22-may-2024

Download(s)

4
checked on 22-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons