Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/307291
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions

AutorGómez-Feria, José CSIC ORCID; Fernández-Corazza, Mariano; Martín-Rodríguez, Juan Francisco CSIC ORCID; Mir, Pablo CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveBrain stimulation
Coil orientation
Computer simulation
Finite element analysis
Patient-specific modeling
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Fecha de publicación21-feb-2022
EditorIOP Publishing
CitaciónPhysics in Medicine & Biology 67(5): 055002 (2022)
Resumen[Objective]: The aim of this study is to define the best coil orientations for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for three clinically relevant brain areas: pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), by means of simulations in 12 realistic head models of the electric field (E-field)
[Methods]: We computed the E-field generated by TMS in our three volumes of interest (VOI) that were delineated based on published atlases. We then analysed the maximum intensity and spatial focality for the normal and absolute components of the E-field considering different percentile thresholds. Lastly, we correlated these results with the different anatomical properties of our VOIs.
[Results]: Overall, the spatial focality of the E-field for the three VOIs varied depending on the orientation of the coil. Further analysis showed that differences in individual brain anatomy were related to the amount of focality achieved. In general, a larger percentage of sulcus resulted in better spatial focality. Additionally, a higher normal E-field intensity was achieved when the coil axis was placed perpendicular to the predominant orientations of the gyri of each VOI. A positive correlation between spatial focality and E-field intensity was found for PPC and IFG but not for pre-SMA.
[Conclusions]: For a rough approximation, better coil orientations can be based on the individual's specific brain morphology at the VOI. Moreover, TMS computational models should be employed to obtain better coil orientations in non-motor regions of interest. Significance. Finding better coil orientations in non-motor regions is a challenge in TMS and seeks to reduce interindividual variability. Our individualized TMS simulation pipeline leads to fewer inter-individual variability in the focality, likely enhancing the efficacy of the stimulation and reducing the risk of stimulating adjacent, non-targeted areas.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef9
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/307291
DOI10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef9
ISSN0031-9155
E-ISSN1361-6560
Aparece en las colecciones: (IBIS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf59,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on 22-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

23
checked on 27-abr-2024

Download(s)

3
checked on 27-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.