Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/307291
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions |
Autor: | Gómez-Feria, José CSIC ORCID; Fernández-Corazza, Mariano; Martín-Rodríguez, Juan Francisco CSIC ORCID; Mir, Pablo CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Brain stimulation Coil orientation Computer simulation Finite element analysis Patient-specific modeling Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) |
Fecha de publicación: | 21-feb-2022 | Editor: | IOP Publishing | Citación: | Physics in Medicine & Biology 67(5): 055002 (2022) | Resumen: | [Objective]: The aim of this study is to define the best coil orientations for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for three clinically relevant brain areas: pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), by means of simulations in 12 realistic head models of the electric field (E-field) [Methods]: We computed the E-field generated by TMS in our three volumes of interest (VOI) that were delineated based on published atlases. We then analysed the maximum intensity and spatial focality for the normal and absolute components of the E-field considering different percentile thresholds. Lastly, we correlated these results with the different anatomical properties of our VOIs. [Results]: Overall, the spatial focality of the E-field for the three VOIs varied depending on the orientation of the coil. Further analysis showed that differences in individual brain anatomy were related to the amount of focality achieved. In general, a larger percentage of sulcus resulted in better spatial focality. Additionally, a higher normal E-field intensity was achieved when the coil axis was placed perpendicular to the predominant orientations of the gyri of each VOI. A positive correlation between spatial focality and E-field intensity was found for PPC and IFG but not for pre-SMA. [Conclusions]: For a rough approximation, better coil orientations can be based on the individual's specific brain morphology at the VOI. Moreover, TMS computational models should be employed to obtain better coil orientations in non-motor regions of interest. Significance. Finding better coil orientations in non-motor regions is a challenge in TMS and seeks to reduce interindividual variability. Our individualized TMS simulation pipeline leads to fewer inter-individual variability in the focality, likely enhancing the efficacy of the stimulation and reducing the risk of stimulating adjacent, non-targeted areas. |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef9 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/307291 | DOI: | 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef9 | ISSN: | 0031-9155 | E-ISSN: | 1361-6560 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IBIS) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 59,24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on 22-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
checked on 23-feb-2024
Page view(s)
23
checked on 27-abr-2024
Download(s)
3
checked on 27-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.