Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/259969
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Exposure of e-waste dismantlers from a formal recycling facility in Spain to inhalable organophosphate and halogenated flame retardants

AutorBalasch, Aleix CSIC ORCID; López Sánchez, María Victoria CSIC ORCID ; Reche, Cristina CSIC ORCID; Viana, Mar CSIC ORCID ; Moreno, Teresa CSIC ORCID ; Eljarrat, Ethel CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveE-waste
Indoor
Inhalation
Occupational exposure
Organophosphate esters
PBDEs
Fecha de publicación29-ene-2022
EditorElsevier
CitaciónChemosphere 294: 133775 (2022)
ResumenConcentration levels of 16 organophosphate esters (OPEs) and 18 halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) were measured in airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from an e-waste dismantling facility in Catalonia (Spain) to assess their occurrence, profiles and potential health risks. Three different areas from the facility were studied, including an area for cathodic ray-tube (CRT) TV dismantling, a grinding area, and the outdoor background. OPEs and HFRs were detected in all samples, with concentrations between 10.4 and 110 ng/m3 for OPEs and from 0.72 to 2213 ng/m3 for HFRs. The compounds with highest concentrations in both working areas were triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) and tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) for OPEs and decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) for HFRs. Higher concentration levels were found in the CRT area compared to the grinding one, probably due to the lower ventilation and different types of e-waste being processed. OPEs were also detected in the solid e-waste from the facility, highlighting the need to evaluate HFR levels in e-waste before proceeding to its re-use. Estimated daily intakes via inhalation during workday were calculated, as well as carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks, these being 25 and 50 times lower than threshold risk values in the worst cases, respectively. However, this calculated risk only considers the workday exposure via inhalation, while other routes of exposure (e.g., ingestion, dermal) could bring these values closer to threshold values.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133775
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/259969
DOI10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133775
ISSN00456535
Aparece en las colecciones: (IDAEA) Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
1-s2.0-S0045653522002685-main.pdfArtículo principal4,08 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
1-s2.0-S0045653522002685-mmc1.docxMaterial suplementario134,64 kBMicrosoft Word XMLVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

1
checked on 29-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on 24-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

62
checked on 01-may-2024

Download(s)

319
checked on 01-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.