Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/251236
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Polyamide-MIL-101(Cr) thin films synthesized on either the outer or Inner surfaces of a polysulfone hollow fiber for water nanofiltration

AutorEchaide‐Górriz, Carlos; Aysa-Martínez, Yolanda CSIC; Navarro, Marta CSIC; Téllez, Carlos CSIC ORCID; Coronas, Joaquín CSIC ORCID
Fecha de publicación2021
EditorAmerican Chemical Society
CitaciónACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 13(6): 7773-7783 (2021)
ResumenHigh-performance thin film nanocomposite (TFN) hollow fiber (HF) membranes, with MIL-101(Cr) MOF nanoparticles (52 ± 13 nm) embedded, have been synthesized with the polyamide layer formed either on the outer or inner surface of a polysulfone HF (250 and 380 μm ID and OD, respectively). The TFN_out membrane was developed using the conventional interfacial polymerization method, typically applied to obtain TFN flat membranes (MOF particles added to the thin layer by deposition). This membrane gave a water permeance value of 1.0 ± 0.7 L·m–2·h–1·bar–1 and a rejection of 90.9 ± 1.2% of acridine orange (AO, 265 Da). In contrast, the TFN_in membrane was synthesized by microfluidic means and gave a significantly higher water permeance of 2.8 ± 0.2 L·m–2·h–1·bar–1 and a slightly lower rejection of 87.4 ± 2.5% of the same solute. This remarkable increase of flux obtained with small solute AO suggests that the HF membranes developed in this work would exhibit good performance with other typical solutes with higher molecular weight than AO. The differences between the performances of both TFN_in and TFN_out membranes lay on the distinct superficial physicochemical properties of the support, the synthesis method, and the different concentrations of MOF present in the polyamide films of both membranes. The TFN_in is more desirable due to its potential advantages, and more effortless scalability due to the microfluidic continuous synthesis. In addition, the TFN_in membrane needs much fewer quantities of reactants to be synthesized than the TFN_out or the flat membrane version.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c21571
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/251236
DOI10.1021/acsami.0c21571
E-ISSN1944-8252
Aparece en las colecciones: (INMA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
poiyamidenano.pdf7,13 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on 19-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

92
checked on 28-abr-2024

Download(s)

87
checked on 28-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons