Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/236121
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Participatory visioning for building disruptive future scenarios for transport and land use planning |
Autor: | Soria Lara, Julio A.; Ariza-Álvarez, Amor; Aguilera-Benavente, F.; Cascajo Jiménez, Rocío; Arce Ruiz, Rosa M.; López García de Leániz, Cristina; Gómez-Delgado, Montserrat | Palabras clave: | Participation Stakeholders Strategic Scenario analysis Planning |
Fecha de publicación: | 2021 | Editor: | Elsevier | Citación: | Journal of Transport Geography 90: 1-12 (2021) | Resumen: | Participatory visioning in transport scenario building can be particularly useful to anticipate and examine unexpected outcomes over long-term future timelines, providing broad legitimacy to today's decision-making processes. However, the strategic value of participatory approaches is increasingly being contested due to the difficulty to operationalize non-linear thinking, resulting in long-term visions similar to business-as-usual projections. To address this challenge, we developed and implemented a novel participatory visioning approach based on using semi-structured interviews that incorporate two types of wild cards – low probability and high impact processes – as disruptive visioning triggers: imaginable and unimaginable processes. A group of experts evaluated the level of disruptive thinking in the generated future visions. The Henares Corridor in the Metropolitan Area of Madrid, Spain provided the empirical focus. The results present a total of seven 2050 visions: one desired common vision plus six wild card visions. Higher levels of disruptive thinking were mainly present in those future visions generated by unimaginable processes, as such processes initiate highly diverging participant future views. It was also noted that smaller and specific groups of participants can visualize 2050 futures more disruptively. Conclusions and reflections on the strengths and weakness of the presented approach are drawn. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102907 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692320309844 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/236121 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102907 | ISSN: | 0966-6923 | E-ISSN: | 1873-1236 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CCHS-IEGD) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 15,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
30
checked on 05-may-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
28
checked on 27-feb-2024
Page view(s)
97
checked on 11-may-2024
Download(s)
25
checked on 11-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.