Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/236121
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Participatory visioning for building disruptive future scenarios for transport and land use planning

AutorSoria Lara, Julio A.; Ariza-Álvarez, Amor; Aguilera-Benavente, F.; Cascajo Jiménez, Rocío; Arce Ruiz, Rosa M.; López García de Leániz, Cristina; Gómez-Delgado, Montserrat
Palabras claveParticipation
Stakeholders
Strategic
Scenario analysis
Planning
Fecha de publicación2021
EditorElsevier
CitaciónJournal of Transport Geography 90: 1-12 (2021)
ResumenParticipatory visioning in transport scenario building can be particularly useful to anticipate and examine unexpected outcomes over long-term future timelines, providing broad legitimacy to today's decision-making processes. However, the strategic value of participatory approaches is increasingly being contested due to the difficulty to operationalize non-linear thinking, resulting in long-term visions similar to business-as-usual projections. To address this challenge, we developed and implemented a novel participatory visioning approach based on using semi-structured interviews that incorporate two types of wild cards – low probability and high impact processes – as disruptive visioning triggers: imaginable and unimaginable processes. A group of experts evaluated the level of disruptive thinking in the generated future visions. The Henares Corridor in the Metropolitan Area of Madrid, Spain provided the empirical focus. The results present a total of seven 2050 visions: one desired common vision plus six wild card visions. Higher levels of disruptive thinking were mainly present in those future visions generated by unimaginable processes, as such processes initiate highly diverging participant future views. It was also noted that smaller and specific groups of participants can visualize 2050 futures more disruptively. Conclusions and reflections on the strengths and weakness of the presented approach are drawn.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102907
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692320309844
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/236121
DOI10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102907
ISSN0966-6923
E-ISSN1873-1236
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IEGD) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on 05-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on 27-feb-2024

Page view(s)

97
checked on 11-may-2024

Download(s)

25
checked on 11-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.