Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/200869
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Barbastelle bats in a wind farm: are they at risk?

AutorApoznanski, Grzegorz; Sánchez-Navarro, Sonia CSIC ORCID; Kokurewicz, Tomasz; Pettersson, Stefan; Rydell, Jens
Palabras claveAcoustic monitoring
Carcass search
Echolocation
Radio-telemetry
Wind energy
Fecha de publicaciónago-2018
EditorSpringer Nature
CitaciónEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research 64: 43 (2018)
ResumenWe need to know if and how western barbastelles Barbastella barbastellus are affected by wind farming in Sweden. This is because wind turbines are frequently constructed in barbastelle habitats and yet there is no national guideline on how the arising conflict should be handled. We studied the movement, behavior and mortality of a barbastelle population at a wind farm in southern Sweden, using radio-telemetry, automatic bat detectors and carcass searches. The tagged bats (6 males and 8 females) roosted mainly under loose bark of dead oak trees and foraged in patches of mature deciduous woodlands or pockets of mature spruce trees within 15 km of the roosts. Extensive areas of young spruce plantation, open farmland and lakes were not used for roosting or foraging but were crossed by commuting bats. Continuous recordings with bat detectors frequently picked up barbastelles at forest edges 30 m from the turbines, but rarely over the turbine pads within 10 m from the turbines and never at heights of 30 and 100 m at the turbine towers. Barbastelles were apparently not attracted to the wind turbines and did not seem to interact with them in any way. Carcass searches under 10 wind turbines at 1-week intervals over three summers did not reveal any dead barbastelles, although three other species were recovered. We conclude that wind farming is not nessarily incompatible with effective conservation of barbastelles in Sweden, but instead of focusing on wind turbines, effors should concentrate on (a) preservation and restoration of mature, age-structured deciduous woodlands and spruce forests, including very small and isolated patches, which provide food and roosts, and probably also (b) avoidance of outdoor lighting in areas used by barbastelles. Designating large circular buffer zones around each known or suspected colony according to current practice would be inefficient or meaningless in our case, because barbastelles use extensive home ranges and switch roost frequently. We argue that barbastelle management must be applied on a landscape scale.
Versión del editorhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1202-1
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/200869
DOI10.1007/s10344-018-1202-1
ISSN1612-4642
E-ISSN1439-0574
Aparece en las colecciones: (EBD) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on 30-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on 13-feb-2024

Page view(s)

199
checked on 30-abr-2024

Download(s)

21
checked on 30-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.