Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/19972
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Roger-
dc.contributor.authorMoltschaniwskyj, Natalie A.-
dc.contributor.authorBozzano, Anna-
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-12T13:06:30Z-
dc.date.available2010-01-12T13:06:30Z-
dc.date.issued2007-08-
dc.identifier.citationReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17(2-3): 101-110 (2007)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-3166-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/19972-
dc.description10 pages, 6 figuresen_US
dc.description.abstractStatolith size and growth was used to determine the influence of abiotic factors on the growth of Loligo vulgaris and Sepioteuthis australis embryos. Recently spawned egg masses collected from the field were incubated in the laboratory under different levels of light intensity, photoperiod, or short periods of low salinity (30&). Double tetracycline staining was used to follow statolith growth. In L. vulgaris constant light conditions produced significantly slower growth in the embryonic statoliths and embryos held at summer photoperiod had slower statolith growth than those held at winter photoperiods. However once they hatched out there was no evidence that photoperiod affected statolith growth. After hatching, in all photoperiods statolith growth rates decreased in comparison with late embryonic rates. In S. australis embryos, differences between the high and medium light intensities for summer and intermediate photoperiods were found, suggesting that under summer incubation temperature, longer daylengths at medium light intensity favoured higher statolith growth for this species. In comparison to controls, slower statolith growth in S. australis embryos due to low salinity only occurred when exposed for 72 h. Comparison with previous studies indicates that temperature seems to be the main abiotic factor influencing statolith growth during early stages, however, interactions among all abiotic factors needs to be determined as well as the unknown influence of other isolated factors, e.g., oxygen concentration within the egg massen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work undertaken by RV and AB at the University of Tasmania was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science (Programa para Movilidad de Investigadores and postdoctoral fellowship, respectively). This work was supported by grants from the European Commission (Cephstock Concerted Action) and the University of Tasmania Merit Grants Schemeen_US
dc.format.extent22195 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEarly lifeen_US
dc.subjectLoliginidaeen_US
dc.subjectEmbryoen_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectStatolithen_US
dc.titleAbiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life historyen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11160-006-9022-x-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-006-9022-xen_US
dc.identifier.e-issn1573-5184-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICM) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on 02-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

409
checked on 09-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.