Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173718
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Effects of filtration on bacterial activity and picoplankton community structure as assessed by flow cytometry

AutorGasol, Josep M. CSIC ORCID ; Morán, Xosé Anxelu G. CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveFiltration
Bacterial activity
Flow cytometry
Picoalgae
Bacteria
Filters
Fecha de publicaciónfeb-1999
EditorInter Research
CitaciónAquatic Microbial Ecology 16(3): 251-264 (1999)
ResumenWe used flow cytometry of autofluorescent and Syto13-stained marine bacteria and the uptake of tritiated leucine to assess the effects of different filter types on picoplankton abundance, community structure and bacterial activity in the filtrate. Coastal and oceanic samples from the NW and SW Mediterranean and the Atlantic coast of Galicia were size-fractionated using polycarbonate (PC), mixed cellulose esters (CE), aluminum oxide (IM) and glass fiber (GF) filters of 0.2 to 1.2 μm nominal pore size from different brands. Flow cytometry of Syto13-stained marine bacteria and autofluorescent photosynthetic prokaryotes was used to analyze picoplankton abundance, size structure and community composition before and after filtration. We combined this capability with the detection of the changes in cell-specific heterotrophic activity in the filtrates. We found that the CE filters retained picoplankton better than the PC filters. The PC filters did not discriminate prokaryotes according to size as much as the GF and the CE filters did. In our hands the IM filters were no better than the CE filters. Bacterial activity in the filtrates increased in the PC and in the CE filtrates and this stimulation of bacterial activity was more important in the less productive environments. We conclude that care must be taken when PC filters are used for generating bacteria-free water, and that the use of CE 0.22 μm filters is the best way of creating picoplankton-free water. However, the picoplankters that will go through the filters may encounter increased nutrient levels. © Inter-Research 1999
Descripción14 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.3354/ame016251
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/173718
DOI10.3354/ame016251
Identificadoresdoi: 10.3354/ame016251
issn: 0948-3055
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICM) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Gasol_et_al_1999.pdf1,22 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

116
checked on 29-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

113
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

292
checked on 15-may-2024

Download(s)

251
checked on 15-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.