Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16152
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorTognetti, C.-
dc.contributor.authorLaos, F.-
dc.contributor.authorMazzarino, M. J.-
dc.contributor.authorHernández Fernández, María Teresa-
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-21T11:29:28Z-
dc.date.available2009-08-21T11:29:28Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationCompost Science and Utilization 13: 6-13 (2005)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1065-657X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/16152-
dc.description.abstractComposts and vermicomposts from a municipal composting plant in northwestern Patagonia, both having undergone a thermophilic phase, (with the vermicompost being inoculated with earthworms after the thermophilic stage) and a nonthermophilic backyard vermicompost were studied. Their effects on soil biological and biochemical properties and plant growth were evaluated in laboratory incubations and a greenhouse trial, using a degraded volcanic soil amended at rates of 20 and 40 g kg-1 of vermicompost or compost. Between the two municipal products, the vermicompost had significantly larger nutrient concentrations than the compost; when mixed with the soil, the vermicompost also had higher microbial populations size and activity, and produced increased ryegrass yields. Compared to the municipal compost, the backyard vermicompost had similar or higher nutrient concentrations but its effects on soil microbial biomass, soil microbial activity and ryegrass yields were lower. Our results suggest that no generalization can be made regarding the higher quality of vermicomposts vs. composts, because the product quality depends both on the original materials and the technology employed.en_US
dc.format.extent579917 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeimage/jpeg-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJG Press Incen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectVermicompostsen_US
dc.subjectCompostsen_US
dc.subjectComposting planten_US
dc.titleComposting vs. Vermicomposting: A Comparison of End Product Qualityen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.jgpress.com/compostscience/archives/_free/000912.html#moreen_US
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Aparece en las colecciones: (CEBAS) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

427
checked on 06-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.