Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/156437
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorVilarrasa, Víctores_ES
dc.contributor.authorCarrera, Jesús es_ES
dc.contributor.authorOlivella, Sebastiàes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-19T07:40:30Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-19T07:40:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-12-
dc.identifier.citationE3S Web of Conferences 9: 04007 (2016)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/156437-
dc.description.abstractGeologic carbon storage is considered to be one of the main solutions to significantly reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere to mitigate climate change. CO2 injection in deep geological formations entails a two-phase flow, being CO2 the non-wetting phase. One of the main concerns of geologic carbon storage is whether the overpressure induced by CO2 injection may compromise the caprock integrity and faults stability. We numerically investigate the two-phase flow effects that govern the overpressure evolution generated by CO2 injection and how this overpressure affects the caprock geomechanical stability. We find that fluid pressure increases sharply at the beginning of injection because CO2 has to displace the brine that fills the pores around the injection well, which reduces the relative permeability. However, overpressure decreases subsequently because once CO2 fills the pores around the injection well, CO2 can flow easily due to its low viscosity and because the relative permeability to CO2 increases. Furthermore, the pressure drop that occurs in the capillary fringe due to two-phase flow interference decreases as the CO2 plume becomes larger. This overpressure evolution induced by CO2 injection, which remains practically constant with time after the initial peak, is very beneficial for maintaining caprock stability. Thus, the sealing capacity of the caprock will be maintained, preventing CO2 leakage to occur across the caprock. © 2016 The Authors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEDP Scienceses_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.titleTwo-phase flow effects on the CO2 injection pressure evolution and implications for the caprock geomechanical stabilityes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/e3sconf/20160904007-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.1051/e3sconf/20160904007es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IDAEA) Comunicaciones congresos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on 07-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on 21-feb-2024

Page view(s)

303
checked on 07-may-2024

Download(s)

182
checked on 07-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.