Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/348728
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMingari, Leonardo-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMacedonio, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorFolch, Arnau-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-29T08:25:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-29T08:25:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.5194/gmd-16-3459-2023-
dc.identifierissn: 1991-9603-
dc.identifier.citationGeoscientific Model Development 16: 3459- 3478 (2023)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/348728-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, there has been a growing interest in ensemble approaches for modelling the atmospheric transport of volcanic aerosol, ash, and lapilli (tephra). The development of such techniques enables the exploration of novel methods for incorporating real observations into tephra dispersal models. However, traditional data assimilation algorithms, including ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) methods, can yield suboptimal state estimates for positive-definite variables such as those related to volcanic aerosols and tephra deposits. This study proposes two new ensemble-based data assimilation techniques for semi-positive-definite variables with highly skewed uncertainty distributions, including aerosol concentrations and tephra deposit mass loading: the Gaussian with non-negative constraints (GNC) and gamma inverse-gamma (GIG) methods. The proposed methods are applied to reconstruct the tephra fallout deposit resulting from the 2015 Calbuco eruption using an ensemble of 256 runs performed with the FALL3D dispersal model. An assessment of the methodologies is conducted considering two independent datasets of deposit thickness measurements: an assimilation dataset and a validation dataset. Different evaluation metrics (e.g. RMSE, MBE, and SMAPE) are computed for the validation dataset, and the results are compared to two references: the ensemble prior mean and the EnKF analysis. Results show that the assimilation leads to a significant improvement over the first-guess results obtained from the simple ensemble forecast. The evidence from this study suggests that the GNC method was the most skilful approach and represents a promising alternative for assimilation of volcanic fallout data. The spatial distributions of the tephra fallout deposit thickness and volume according to the GNC analysis are in good agreement with estimations based on field measurements and isopach maps reported in previous studies. On the other hand, although it is an interesting approach, the GIG method failed to improve the EnKF analysis.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been partially funded by the H2020 Center of Excellence for Exascale in Solid Earth (ChEESE) (grant no. 823844) and by the European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme (DT-GEO (grant no. 101058129)). The research leading to these results has received funding from EuroHPC (ChEESE-2P (grant no. 101093038)).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Union-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/823844-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101058129-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101093038-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.subjectAerosol-
dc.subjectAtmospheric chemistry-
dc.subjectAtmospheric transport-
dc.subjectData assimilation-
dc.subjectFall-
dc.subjectout-
dc.subjectTephravolcanic ash-
dc.subjectDT-GEO-
dc.titleReconstructing tephra fall deposits via ensemble-based data assimilation techniques-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3459-2023-
dc.date.updated2024-02-29T08:25:54Z-
dc.rights.holderopenAccess-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.relation.csic-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Aparece en las colecciones: (Geo3Bcn) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Geoscientific_ Model_Development_16_3459_2023.pdf5,35 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

11
checked on 15-may-2024

Download(s)

2
checked on 15-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons