Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/340495
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Using integrated wildlife monitoring to prevent future pandemics through one health approach

AutorBarroso, Patricia CSIC ORCID; Relimpio Peral, David CSIC; Zearra, Jon Ander CSIC; Cerón, José J.; Palencia, Pablo CSIC ORCID; Cardoso, Beatriz CSIC ORCID; Ferreras-Colino, Elisa CSIC ORCID; Escobar González, María; Cáceres, Germán; López-Olvera, Jorge R. CSIC ORCID; Gortázar, Christian CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveAnthropogenic imbalances
Disease risk
Host community
Integrated wildlife monitoring
One health
Wildlife health monitoring
Fecha de publicación2023
EditorElsevier
CitaciónOne Health 16: 100479 (2023)
ResumenIn the One Health context, Integrated Wildlife Monitoring (IWM) merges wildlife health monitoring (WHM) and host community monitoring to early detect emerging infections, record changes in disease dynamics, and assess the impact of interventions in complex multi-host and multi-pathogen networks. This study reports the deployment and results obtained from a nationwide IWM pilot test in eleven sites representing the habitat diversity of mainland Spain. In each study site, camera-trap networks and sampling of indicator species for antibody and biomarker analysis were used to generate information. The results allowed identifying differences in biodiversity and host community characteristics among the study sites, with a range of 8 to 19 relevant host species per point. The Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) was the most connected and central species of the host communities, becoming a key target indicator species for IWM. A negative relationship between biodiversity and disease risk was detected, with a lower number and prevalence of circulating pathogens in the sites with more species in the community and larger network size. However, this overall trend was modified by specific host-community and environmental factors, such as the relative index of wild boar - red deer interactions or the proximity to urban habitats, suggesting that human-driven imbalances may favour pathogen circulation. The effort of incorporating wildlife population monitoring into the currently applied WHM programs to achieve effective IWM was also evaluated, allowing to identify population monitoring as the most time-consuming component, which should be improved in the future. This first nationwide application of IWM allowed to detect drivers and hotspots for disease transmission risk among wildlife, domestic animals, and humans, as well as identifying key target indicator species for monitoring. Moreover, anthropogenic effects such as artificially high wildlife densities and urbanisation were identified as risk factors for disease prevalence and interspecific transmission.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100479
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/340495
DOI10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100479
E-ISSN2352-7714
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
usingapproach.pdf6,26 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

8
checked on 13-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on 19-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

15
checked on 26-abr-2024

Download(s)

9
checked on 26-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons