Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/263750
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Closa Montero, Carlos | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-11T09:20:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-11T09:20:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-29 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Political Science 20: 270–280 (2021) | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1680-4333 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/263750 | - |
dc.description | Este archivo incluye un template research protocol. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | Qualitative political science research can significantly increase its credibility if researchers take robust steps toward replicability and enhanced transparency. Making explicit decisions on planning and implementing research, together with commitment to comprehensive reporting, improves transparency. Three instruments serve to this objective: in the planning stage, research protocols map prospective actions in the implementation of research. In the implementing stage, research notebooks permit recording all decisions, deviations and events affecting research. Practical and ethical considerations may prevent the full disclosure of these research notebooks, and, hence, carefully drafted research implementation records provide, in the publication stage, a useful instrument to convey this information. Increased transparency (as created by the use of these three instruments) will lead to better options for replicability, and this, in turn, will increase the validity of qualitative research and dispel some of the concerns about its methodological soundness. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | es_ES |
dc.relation.isversionof | Postprint | es_ES |
dc.rights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.title | Planning, implementing and reporting: increasing transparency, replicability and credibility in qualitative political science research | es_ES |
dc.type | artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1057/s41304-020-00299-2 | - |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-020-00299-2#Ack1 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.e-issn | 1682-0983 | - |
dc.rights.license | Postprint 12 meses de embargo | es_ES |
dc.relation.csic | Sí | es_ES |
oprm.item.hasRevision | no ko 0 false | * |
dc.contributor.orcid | Closa Montero, Carlos [0000-0002-2935-1926] | es_ES |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | es_ES |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | artículo | - |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CCHS-IPP) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Planning_implementing_reporting.pdf | 772,59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir | |
Template research protocol.pdf | 660,24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
checked on 11-may-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
11
checked on 21-feb-2024
Page view(s)
149
checked on 17-may-2024
Download(s)
105
checked on 17-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.