Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/261963
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Performance of Salamanca refinement of the T3-AJCC8 versus the Brigham and Women's Hospital and Tübingen alternative staging systems for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma |
Autor: | Puebla-Tornero, Laura; Corchete, Luis A.; Conde-Ferreirós, Alberto; García-Sancha, Natalia CSIC ORCID; Corchado Cobos, Roberto CSIC ORCID; Román-Curto, Concépción; Cañueto, Javier | Palabras clave: | AJCC8 Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Prognosis Skin cancer Staging |
Fecha de publicación: | abr-2021 | Editor: | Elsevier Mosby American Academy of Dermatology |
Citación: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 84(4): 938-945 (2021) | Resumen: | [Introduction]: The Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Tübingen cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) stratification systems propose different criteria from the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition. Our group identified prognostic subgroups within T3 stage according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition's classification, the most common classification for high-risk cutaneous SCCs. [Objective]: To compare the performance and prognostic accuracy of these staging systems in a subset of high-risk cutaneous SCCs. [Methods]: Homogeneity, monotonicity, and McNemar tests for pairwise comparisons were assessed. Distinctiveness and relative risk of poor outcome were calculated by stage. Prognostic accuracy was compared with respect to quality (Akaike and Bayesian information criteria), concordance (Harrell C-index and Gönen and Heller concordance probability estimate), and predictive accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and global accuracy). [Results]: The Brigham and Women's Hospital and Salamanca systems were more distinctive, homogeneous, and monotonic than the Tübingen system. The Tübingen system was the most specific, whereas the Salamanca and Brigham and Women's Hospital systems were more sensitive. Negative predictive value was high in all 3 systems, but positive predictive value and accuracy were low overall. [Conclusions]: Alternative staging systems may partially overcome the heterogeneity and low prognostic accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition and enable high-risk cutaneous SCCs to be stratified more reliably, but their prognostic accuracy is still low. Considering the accumulation of risk factors may improve high-risk cutaneous SCC risk stratification. |
Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.020 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/261963 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.020 | ISSN: | 0190-9622 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IBMCC) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 15,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
checked on 29-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
9
checked on 19-feb-2024
Page view(s)
32
checked on 01-may-2024
Download(s)
9
checked on 01-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.