Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/249461
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorColl, Annaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorNadal, Annaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCollado, Rosaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCapellades, Gemmaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorKubista, Mikaeles_ES
dc.contributor.authorMesseguer, Joaquimaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPla, Maríaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T13:17:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T13:17:03Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationPlant Molecular Biology 73: 349–362 (2010)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0167-4412-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/249461-
dc.description.abstractThe introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in many countries follows strict regulations to ensure that only safety-tested products are marketed. Over the last few years, targeted approaches have been complemented by profiling methods to assess possible unintended effects of transformation. Here we used a commercial (Affymertix) microarray platform (i.e. allowing assessing the expression of ~1/3 of the genes of maize) to evaluate transcriptional differences between commercial MON810 GM maize and non-transgenic crops in real agricultural conditions, in a region where about 70% of the maize grown was MON810. To consider natural variation in gene expression in relation to biotech plants we took two common MON810/non-GM variety pairs as examples, and two farming practices (conventional and low-nitrogen fertilization). MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties grown in the field have very low numbers of sequences with differential expression, and their identity differs among varieties. Furthermore, we show that the differences between a given MON810 variety and the non-GM counterpart do not appear to depend to any major extent on the assayed cultural conditions, even though these differences may slightly vary between the conditions. In our study, natural variation explained most of the variability in gene expression among the samples. Up to 37.4% was dependent upon the variety (obtained by conventional breeding) and 31.9% a result of the fertilization treatment. In contrast, the MON810 GM character had a very minor effect (9.7%) on gene expression in the analyzed varieties and conditions, even though similar cryIA(b) expression levels were detected in the two MON810 varieties and nitrogen treatments. This indicates that transcriptional differences of conventionally-bred varieties and under different environmental conditions should be taken into account in safety assessment studies of GM plants.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was financially supported by the Spanish MEC project with ref. AGL2007-65903/AGR. AC received a studentship from the Generalitat de Catalunya (2005FI 00144).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.titleNatural variation explains most transcriptomic changes among maize plants of MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties subjected to two N-fertilization farming practiceses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11103-010-9624-5-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-010-9624-5es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Educación y Ciencia (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderGeneralitat de Catalunyaes_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002809es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (CRAG) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf59,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

52
checked on 16-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

46
checked on 20-feb-2024

Page view(s)

51
checked on 21-may-2024

Download(s)

6
checked on 21-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.