Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/236694
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Catheter-related bloodstream infections: predictive factors for Gram-negative bacteria aetiology and 30 day mortality in a multicentre prospective cohort

AutorCalò, Federica; Retamar Gentil, Pilar CSIC ORCID; Martínez Pérez-Crespo, Pedro María; Lanz-García, Joaquín CSIC; Sousa, Adrián; Goikoetxea-Aguirre, Josune; Reguera-Iglesias, J. M.; León Jiménez, Eva CSIC; Armiñanzas Castillo, Carlos; Mantecón Vallejo, María Ángeles; Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús CSIC ORCID
Fecha de publicaciónoct-2020
EditorOxford University Press
CitaciónJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 75(10): 3056-3061 (2020)
Resumen[Background] Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospitalization and generate considerable medical costs. Recent guidelines for CRBSI recommend empirical therapy against Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and restrict coverage for Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) only to specific circumstances.
[Objectives]To investigate predictors of GNB aetiology in CRBSI and to assess the predictors of outcome in patients with CRBSI.
[Methods] Patients with CRBSI were selected from the PROBAC cohort, a prospective, observational, multicentre national cohort study including patients with bloodstream infections consecutively admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals in a 6 month period (October 2016–March 2017). Outcome variables were GNB aetiology and 30 day mortality. Adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression.
[Results] Six hundred and thirty-one episodes of CRBSI were included in the study. Risk factors independently related to GNB aetiology were central venous catheter (CVC) [OR 1.60 (95% CI: 1.05–2.44), P = 0.028], sepsis/septic shock [OR: 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11–2.80), P = 0.016], antibiotic therapy in the previous 30 days [OR: 1.56 (95% CI: 1.02–2.36), P = 0.037], neutropenia <500/μL [OR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.04–3.87), P = 0.037] and peripheral vascular disease [OR: 2.04 (95% CI: 1.13–3.68), P = 0.018]. GNB were not associated with increased mortality in adjusted analysis, while removal of catheter [OR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09–0.61), P = 0.002] and adequate empirical treatment [OR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.18–0.77), P = 0.008] were strong protective factors.
[Conclusions] Our study reinforces the recommendation that empirical coverage should cover GNB in patients presenting with sepsis/septic shock and in neutropenic patients. Catheter removal and adequate empirical treatment were both protective factors against mortality in patients with CRBSI.
DescripciónPROBAC REIPI/GEIH-SEIMC/SAEI.
Versión del editorhttp://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa262
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/236694
DOI10.1093/jac/dkaa262
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa262
issn: 0305-7453
e-issn: 1460-2091
Aparece en las colecciones: (IBIS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on 07-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on 19-may-2024

Download(s)

15
checked on 19-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.