Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/236664
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

IGS real-time service for global ionospheric total electron content modeling

AutorLi, Zishen; Hernández-Pajares, Manuel CSIC ORCID; Yuan, Yunbin; Krankowski, Andrzej; Liu, A.; Zha, Jiuping; García-Rigo, Alberto; Roma-Dollase, David CSIC ORCID CVN; Yang, Heng; Laurichesse, Denis; Blot, Alexis
Palabras claveReal-time global ionospheric maps
Real-time service (RTS)
RT experimental IGS combined ionospheric product
State space representation (SSR)
Total electron content (TEC)
Fecha de publicación1-mar-2020
EditorSpringer Nature
CitaciónJournal of Geodesy 94(3): 32 (2020)
ResumenBenefiting from global multi-frequency and multi-constellation GNSS measurements provided by the experimental International GNSS real-time service (IGS RTS), a predicting-plus-modeling approach employed by Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for the routine generation of real-time global ionospheric maps (RT-GIM) is first reported. Along with RT-GIMs generated by Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), the quality of CAS and UPC RT-GIMs in IONEX format is assessed during a low soar activity period from September 2017 to December 2019. The differential slant total electron contents (dSTEC) derived from 50 GPS stations of the IGS and Jason-3 vertical TECs (VTEC) over the ocean are used as references. In comparison with different reference TECs, CAS and UPC RT-GIMs are approximately 1.7–4.9% and 8.6–12.5% worse than the respective post-processed GIMs CASG and UQRG, respectively. Using RTCM ionospheric data streams from CAS, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and UPC, the first experimental IGS combined RT-GIM is generated and validated in actual real-time conditions. Compared to Jason-3 VTEC measurements available during the period of common availability, from October 2018 to April 2019, RT-GIM discrepancies present similar relative RMS errors, which are 33, 36, 36 and 38% for CNES, combined one, UPC and CAS, respectively. Aside from a better understanding of the influence of working in the original IONEX versus RTCM ionospheric formats, the update to a new experimental adaptation of RT strategy is highlighted by UPC, and the computation of multi-layer RT-GIM is emphasized by CAS in view of the inadequacy of single-layer ionospheric assumption in the presence of large latitudinal gradients.
Versión del editorhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01360-0
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/236664
DOI10.1007/s00190-020-01360-0
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1007/s00190-020-01360-0
issn: 1432-1394
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICE) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

70
checked on 20-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

58
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

98
checked on 29-may-2024

Download(s)

11
checked on 29-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.