Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/222007
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Statistical adjustment, calibration and downscaling of seasonal forecasts: a case-study for Southeast Asia

AutorManzanas, Rodrigo CSIC ORCID; Gutiérrez, José M. CSIC ORCID ; Bhend, Jonas; Hemri, Stephan; Doblas-Reyes, Francisco J.; Penabad, E.; Brookshaw, Anca
Fecha de publicación2020
EditorSpringer Nature
CitaciónClimate Dynamics 54: 2869–2882 (2020)
ResumenThe present paper is a follow-on of the work presented in Manzanas et al. (Clim Dyn 53(3–4):1287–1305, 2019) which provides a comprehensive intercomparison of alternatives for the post-processing (statistical adjustment, calibration and downscaling) of seasonal forecasts for a particularly interesting region, Southeast Asia. To answer the questions that were raised in the preceding work, apart from Bias Adjustment (BA) and ensemble Re-Calibration (RC) methods—which transform directly the variable of interest,—we include here more complex Perfect Prognosis (PP) and Model Outputs Statistics (MOS) downscaling techniques—which operate on a selection of large-scale model circulation variables linked to the local observed variable of interest. Moreover, we test the suitability of BA and PP methods for the post-processing of daily—not only seasonal—time-series, which are often needed in a variety of sectoral applications (crop, hydrology, etc.) or to compute specific climate indices (heat waves, fire weather index, etc.). In addition, we also undertake an assessment of the effect that observational uncertainty may have for statistical post-processing. Our results indicate that PP methods (and to a lesser extent MOS) are highly case-dependent and their application must be carefully analyzed for the region/season/application of interest, since they can either improve or degrade the raw model outputs. Therefore, for those cases for which the use of these methods cannot be carefully tested by experts, our overall recommendation would be the use of BA methods, which seem to be a safe, easy to implement alternative that provide competitive results in most situations. Nevertheless, all methods (including BA ones) seem to be sensitive to observational uncertainty, especially regarding the reproduction of extremes and spells. For MOS and PP methods, this issue can even lead to important regional differences in interannual skill. The lessons learnt from this work can substantially benefit a wide range of end-users in different socio-economic sectors, and can also have important implications for the development of high-quality climate services.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05145-1
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/222007
DOI10.1007/s00382-020-05145-1
ISSN0930-7575
E-ISSN1432-0894
Aparece en las colecciones: (IFCA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
staticalAsia.pdf19,58 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on 28-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on 22-feb-2024

Page view(s)

119
checked on 30-abr-2024

Download(s)

526
checked on 30-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.