Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/20566
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Political Knowledge and the Logic of Voting: A Comparative Study |
Autor: | Fraile Maldonado, Marta CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Ciencias Sociales Ciencias Políticas Procesos de decisión Elecciones |
Fecha de publicación: | abr-2006 | Editor: | Fundación Juan March | Citación: | Political Knowledge and the Logic of Voting: A Comparative Study, Serie Documentos de Trabajo, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos, 223-2006 | Serie: | Estudios / Documento de Trabajo IPP, 223-2006 | Resumen: | This paper will examine the decision making process by which individual voters cast their ballots. In particular, it will discuss two traditional explanations of electoral behaviour: ideological voting and performance voting. These explanations of voting share a common assumption: electors’ decisions are based on what they expect to get from their choice. Each potential outcome has a benefit or a cost, and citizens might choose the one benefiting them most or costing them least. That is, voters will maximize the utility of their electoral decision. In order to maximize the utility of a given decision an individual needs to have a certain amount of information at hand. | Descripción: | This paper forms part of a collective research project on Empirical Democratic Theory coordinated by José María Maravall and Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca. | Versión del editor: | http://www.march.es/ceacs/publicaciones/working/archivos/2006_223.pdf | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/20566 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CCHS-IPP) Informes y documentos de trabajo |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
political_comparative_study.pdf | 136,3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
337
checked on 07-may-2024
Download(s)
818
checked on 07-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.