Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/201758
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Left-sided infective endocarditis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae: rare and serious

AutorIvanova-Georgieva, Radka; Ruiz-Morales, Josefa; García-Cabrera, Emilio; García-López, María Victoria; Gálvez-Acebal, Juan CSIC ORCID CVN; Plata-Ciezar, Antonio; Torre, Javier de la; Hidalgo-Tenorio, Carmen; Martínez-Marcos, Francisco Javier; Vinuesa García, David; Luque-Márquez, Rafael CSIC ORCID; Alarcón González, Arístides de CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveLeft-sided infective endocarditis
Streptococcus agalactiae
Staphylococcus aureus
Fecha de publicación4-feb-2019
EditorSpringer Nature
CitaciónEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 38: 265-275 (2019)
ResumenA comparative study of the behaviour of left-sided infective endocarditis (left-sided IE) due to Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) with left-sided IE caused by Staphylococcus aureus (SA). A prospective, multicentre cohort study in eight public hospitals in Spain, from January 1984 to December 2015; comparative analysis and factors associated with mortality. In total, there were 1754 episodes of left-sided IE; 41 (2.3%) caused by GBS vs. 344 (19.6%) due to SA, definitive IE 39 vs. 324 cases, males, 25 vs. 213, respectively. There were no differences in age or comorbidity, and healthcare-associated acquirement was 10% vs. 43%, p 0.001. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed in 95% vs. 96.8% and a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) in 61% vs. 56%. Vegetations were detected in 80% and measured > 1 cm in a similar proportion. It affected native valves in 85.4% vs. 82.6% and late prosthetic valve in 14.6% vs. 9.6%. The course was acute in both groups. There were more skin manifestations in SA left-sided IE, 7.3% vs. 32%, p 0.001. Both groups had similar complications, but in SA, there was more renal failure, 24% vs. 45%, p 0.010. Surgical risk and operated patients were similar. Mortality was proportionally higher in the SA group, without significance 29% vs. 43% (150), p 0.09. Heart failure, septic shock and neurological deterioration conditioned mortality: HR 1.96, 1.69 and 1.37 (CI 95% 1.40–2.73; 1.19–2.39 and 0.99–1.88 respectively) and to a lesser degree SA as aetiology agent and age. Left-sided IE caused by GBS is similar in severity to left-sided IE caused by SA.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3423-3
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/201758
DOI10.1007/s10096-018-3423-3
ISSN0934-9723
E-ISSN1435-4373
Aparece en las colecciones: (IBIS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf59,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on 09-may-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

164
checked on 07-may-2024

Download(s)

31
checked on 07-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.