Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/11798
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorFarré, Marinella-
dc.contributor.authorBrix, Rikke-
dc.contributor.authorKuster, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorRubio, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorGoda, Yasuhiro-
dc.contributor.authorLópez de Alda, Miren-
dc.contributor.authorBarceló, Damià-
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-23T12:37:37Z-
dc.date.available2009-03-23T12:37:37Z-
dc.date.issued2006-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 385(6): 1001-1011 (2006)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1618-2642-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/11798-
dc.description11 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this work four different commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (from Japan EnviroChemicals, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated in terms of performance for the rapid screening of estrogens in different water matrices, including natural and spiked samples from urban wastewater, river water and ground water. All four test kits are based on monoclonal antibodies. The compounds detected by these immunoassays are (1) 17-β-estradiol, (2) estrone, (3) 17-α-ethynyl estradiol and (4) estrogens in general, with high recognition properties for 17-β-estradiol, estrone and estriol. Standards were prepared in water containing 10% (v/v) methanol. The IC 50 (corresponding to the 50% of the effective concentration) values, the dynamic ranges, and the limits of detection of the ELISA kits were 0.060–0.304 μg/L, 0.05–5 μg/L and 0.05 μg/L, respectively. All samples were extracted by solid-phase extraction (SPE) beforehand, and the evaluation was carried out by comparing the results obtained by ELISA with those obtained by HPLC–MS/MS using a triple quadrupole (QqQ) instrument. In addition, two different solid-phase extraction procedures were carried out and compared. Except for moderate overestimation in the results observed with the ELISA kits in the analysis of complex wastewater samples, the results obtained using all of the tested techniques were generally in very good agreement.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the EU through the projects SWIFT-WFD (SSPI-CT-2003-502492) and MODELKEY (SSPI-CT-2003-511237-2), and by the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología through the projects CTM2005-24255-E and EVITA (CTM2004-06265-C03-01/TECNO). Marinella Farré thanks the support from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia through the Juan de la Cierva program.en_US
dc.format.extent19968 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectImmunoassayen_US
dc.subjectELISAen_US
dc.subjectEstrogensen_US
dc.subjectLC–MS/MSen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of commercial immunoassays for the detection of estrogens in water by comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry HPLC–MS/MS (QqQ)en_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00216-006-0562-7-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0562-7en_US
dc.identifier.e-issn1618-2650-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IDAEA) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

38
checked on 22-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
checked on 27-feb-2024

Page view(s)

374
checked on 07-may-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.