Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/99280
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Quezada, Jorge F.-
dc.contributor.authorCavero Campo, José-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Jimmy R.-
dc.contributor.authorRoel, Alvaro-
dc.contributor.authorPlant, Richard E.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-02T09:42:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-02T09:42:20Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifierissn: 0001-2351-
dc.identifier.citationTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 46(5): 1365-1374 (2003)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/99280-
dc.description.abstractSoil data were collected from a 30 ha commercial field using a 60 m sampling grid. Monitored yield data were also collected in this field between 1996 and 1999, when it had a wheat-processing tomato-bean-sunflower crop rotation. A comparison between SSURGO-NRCS soil-unit definition and field-measured soil data showed that in this field the former are a good approximation and starting point for precision agriculture studies and management. In a second test, the EPIC model, using the SSURGO database soil type definitions, was found to reproduce the yield variability within this field with reasonable accuracy. The model's performance was not as good when tested with data from soil samples, apparently due to the way EPIC simulates water holding capacity from texture information and the lack of some key variables (not sampled), such as water content at field-capacity (FC), wilting-point (WP), and soil saturated conductivity. A set of runs was performed to simulate the yield at 13 point-locations in the field using FC, WP, and bulk density. Although the accuracy of the simulation did not improve greatly, the model reproduced the yield trend of two of the crops (wheat and sunflower).-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported in part by the Fertilizer Research and Education Program of the California Department of Food and Agriculture.-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectPrecision agriculture-
dc.subjectManagement zones-
dc.subjectSpatial variability-
dc.subjectSSURGO data-
dc.subjectTemporal variability-
dc.subjectEPIC model-
dc.titleSimulation of within-field yield variability in a four-crop rotation field using SSURGO Soil-Unit definitions and the Epic Model-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.13031/2013.15447-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.15447-
dc.date.updated2014-07-02T09:42:20Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

260
checked on 28-mar-2024

Download(s)

84
checked on 28-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.