Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/99185
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | On the reliability of the AMS ellipsoid by statistical methods |
Autor: | Guerrero Suárez, Sara CSIC; Martín Hernández, Fátima CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility Bootstrap Linear Perturbation Analysis Rock magnetism |
Fecha de publicación: | 18-abr-2014 | Editor: | Elsevier | Citación: | Tectonophysics, in press, 2014 | Resumen: | Weak magnetic materials whose susceptibility values are close to the instrument's accuracy show very large errors in the direct evaluation of their ellipsoid parameters. This may lead to misinterpretation of the magnetic fabric, which is often used as a geological indicator. In order to estimate the measurement uncertainties, several statistical methods have been proposed. Within the available statistical methods, the Linear Perturbation Analysis (Hext, 1963) and the non-parametric bootstrap (Constable and Tauxe, 1990) technique have been widely used. In this paper, we make a complete study about these methods to estimate their limitations when applied to n measurements of a single sample. We will analyze which method is better in terms of uncertainties, we will determine when the methods do not provide reliable results and we will establish a measuring protocol. For that, we run simulations for the Linear Perturbation Analysis and the non-parametric bootstrap varying i) the number of measurements, ii) the instrumental error and iii) the shape parameter and the anisotropy degree of the AMS ellipsoid. The results show that both methods are not reliable when the difference between eigenvalues is too close in relation to the instrumental error, but increasing the number of measurements can improve the results. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.04.010 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/99185 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.04.010 | ISSN: | 0040-1951 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IGEO) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TECTO-Guerrero-Suarez.pdf | 303,65 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on 17-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
checked on 26-feb-2024
Page view(s)
277
checked on 19-abr-2024
Download(s)
710
checked on 19-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.