English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/99097
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 4 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Is laying a large egg expensive? Female-biased cost of first reproduction in a petrel

Autor Sanz-Aguilar, Ana ; Mínguez, Eduardo; Oro, Daniel
Palabras clave Hydrobates pelagicus
First reproduction
Survival
Egg size
Breeding biology
Mark-recapture statistics
Reproductive effort
European Storm-Petrel
Fecha de publicación 2012
EditorAmerican Ornithologists' Union
Citación The Auk 129(3): 510-516 (2012)
ResumenDifferential reproductive investment between sexes can lead to asymmetric costs of reproduction in birds. Long-lived procellariiform seabirds are single-egg layers with little sexual dimorphism and similar parental investment in incubation and chick rearing. However, sex-specific tasks exist at the beginning of the breeding season, including egg production by females (no courtship feeding by males in this group of species) and nest and mate guarding by males. Costs of reproduction could be evident during critical periods such as the first breeding attempt, because of inexperience in reproductive tasks or a higher proportion of low-quality individuals in young age classes, or both. Little is known about sex-specific costs of reproduction in monomorphic species, in which we expect costs to be similar. We investigated the effects of first reproduction on the subsequent survival of male and female European Storm-Petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus) and found that female survival (0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–0.82) was lower than that of males (0.85; 95% CI: 0.76–0.89) after first reproduction. However, these differences were not observed in subsequent breeding attempts by experienced females (0.89; 95% CI: 0.86–0.91) and males (0.88; 95% CI: 0.86–0.91), probably because of an experience-related improvement in foraging efficiency, reproductive tasks, or predator avoidance. The effort invested by inexperienced females in the production of a large egg (≤25% of adult body mass) may explain our observed differences in survival.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.12011
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/99097
DOI10.1525/auk.2012.12011
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1525/auk.2012.12011
issn: 0004-8038
Aparece en las colecciones: (IMEDEA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Sanz-The-Auk-2012-v129-n3-p510.pdf188,99 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.