English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/98188
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Towards mitigation of greenhouse gases by small changes in farming practices: understanding local barriers in Spain

AuthorsSánchez Fernández, Berta; Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge ; Cunningham, Ruth; Iglesias Picazo, Ana
KeywordsBarriers to adoption
Farming practices
Mitigation practices
Multi-criteria Analysis
Surveys
Issue Date2016
PublisherSpringer
CitationSánchez B, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cunningham R, Iglesias A. Towards mitigation of greenhouse gases by small changes in farming practices: understanding local barriers in Spain. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 21 (7): 995-1028 (2016)
AbstractSmall changes in agricultural practices have a large potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the implementation of such practices at the local level is often limited by a range of barriers. Understanding the barriers is essential for defining effective measures, the actual mitigation potential of the measures, and the policy needs to ensure implementation. Here we evaluate behavioural, cultural, and policy barriers for implementation of mitigation practices at the local level that imply small changes to farmers. The choice of potential mitigation practices relevant to the case study is based on a literature review of previous empirical studies. Two methods that include the stakeholders’ involvement (experts and farmers) are undertaken for the prioritization of these potential practices: (a) Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) of the choices of an expert panel and (b) Analysis of barriers to implementation based on a survey of farmers. The MCA considers two future climate scenarios – current climate and a drier and warmer climate scenario. Results suggest that all potential selected practices are suitable for mitigation considering multiple criteria in both scenarios. Nevertheless, if all the barriers for implementation had the same influence, the preferred mitigation practices in the case study would be changes in fertilization management and use of cover crops. The identification of barriers for the implementation of the practices is based on the econometric analysis of surveys given to farmers. Results show that farmers’ environmental concerns, financial incentives and access to technical advice are the main factors that define their barriers to implementation. These results may contribute to develop effective mitigation policy to be included in the 2020 review of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy.
DescriptionPags.- 8 Tabls.- 6 Figs. The definitive version is available at: http://link.springer.com/journal/11027
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9562-7
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/98188
DOI10.1007/s11027-014-9562-7
ISSN1381-2386
E-ISSN1573-1596
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AlvaroJ_MASGC_2014.pdf755,46 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.