Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9769
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorNavas Cortés, Juan Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorLanda, Blanca B.-
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Díaz, Rafael M.-
dc.contributor.authorVovlas, Nicola-
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-21T15:48:27Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-21T15:48:27Z-
dc.date.issued2008-06-
dc.identifier.citationPlant Disease 92(6): 840-853 (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0191-2917-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/9769-
dc.description14 pages, 13 figures.en_US
dc.description.abstractChickpea (Cicer arietinum) is a cool-season food legume second in importance as a pulse crop in the world after beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). It is an important protein source in many regions of the semi-arid tropics. Chickpea is grown in 47 countries and is a significant component of subsistence cropping systems for farmers in the Indian Subcontinent, West Asia, the Mediterranean Basin, and certain areas of East and North Africa. More than 90% of the chickpea crops are grown in eight countries, including India, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Ethiopia, Mexico, Australia and Canada, in decreasing order.en_US
dc.description.abstractMany species of plant-parasitic nematodes have been reported in the roots and rhizosphere of chickpea in the major growing regions in the world (Table 1). However, only certain nematode species are considered constraints to chickpea production, causing an estimated 14% in annual yield losses (61,68). The symptoms and signs of nematode parasitism on chickpea differ depending upon the nematode’s feeding habit. Moreover, nematode attacks can make plants more sensitive to other biotic and abiotic stresses, and overall result in stunting and poor yield.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOriginal results from the authors reported in this article were derived from research supported by grants (AGL2003-0640, AGL2004-01231) from Dirección General de Investigación, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain.en_US
dc.format.extent1544175 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Phytopathological Societyen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChickpeasen_US
dc.subjectCicer arietinumen_US
dc.subjectPlant-parasitic nematodesen_US
dc.subjectRoot-knot nematodesen_US
dc.subjectMeloidogyne spp.en_US
dc.subjectRoot-lesion nematodesen_US
dc.subjectPratylenchus spp.en_US
dc.subjectCyst-forming nematodesen_US
dc.subjectHeterodera spp.en_US
dc.subjectReniform nematodeen_US
dc.subjectRotylenchulus reniformisen_US
dc.subjectPathogenicityen_US
dc.subjectDisease managementen_US
dc.subjectInteractionsen_US
dc.titlePlant-Parasitic Nematodes Attacking Chickpea and Their In Planta Interactions with Rhizobia and Phytopathogenic Fungien_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1094/PDIS-92-6-0840-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-6-0840en_US
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Educación y Ciencia (España)-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IAS) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on 02-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

356
checked on 22-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.