English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/97617
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Molecular characterization of the EhaG and UpaG trimeric autotransporter proteins from pathogenic Escherichia coli

AuthorsTotsika, Makrina; Wells, Timothy N.C.; Beloin, Christophe; Valle Turrillas, Jaione ; Allsopp, Luke P.; King, Nathan P.; Ghigo, Jean-Marc; Schembri, Mark A.
Issue Date27-Jan-2012
PublisherAmerican Society for Microbiology
CitationApplied and Environmental Microbiology 80(12): 2179-2189 (2012)
AbstractTrimeric autotransporter proteins (TAAs) are important virulence factors of many Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. A common feature of most TAAs is the ability to mediate adherence to eukaryotic cells or extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins via a cell surface-exposed passenger domain. Here we describe the characterization of EhaG, a TAA identified from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7. EhaG is a positional orthologue of the recently characterized UpaG TAA from uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC). Similarly to UpaG, EhaG localized at the bacterial cell surface and promoted cell aggregation, biofilm formation, and adherence to a range of ECM proteins. However, the two orthologues display differential cellular binding: EhaG mediates specific adhesion to colorectal epithelial cells while UpaG promotes specific binding to bladder epithelial cells. The EhaG and UpaG TAAs contain extensive sequence divergence in their respective passenger domains that could account for these differences. Indeed, sequence analyses of UpaG and EhaG homologues from several E. coli genomes revealed grouping of the proteins in clades almost exclusively represented by distinct E. coli pathotypes. The expression of EhaG (in EHEC) and UpaG (in UPEC) was also investigated and shown to be significantly enhanced in an hns isogenic mutant, suggesting that H-NS acts as a negative regulator of both TAAs. Thus, while the EhaG and UpaG TAAs contain some conserved binding and regulatory features, they also possess important differences that correlate with the distinct pathogenic lifestyles of EHEC and UPEC. © 2012, American Society for Microbiology.
Identifiersdoi: 10.1128/AEM.06680-11
issn: 0099-2240
Appears in Collections:(IDAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.