Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/96963
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCorrales, Luis-
dc.contributor.authorBautista-Sopelana, Luis M.-
dc.contributor.authorSantamaría, Tomás-
dc.contributor.authorMas, Pedro-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:40:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:40:38Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationArdeola: revista ibérica de ornitologíaes_ES
dc.identifier.issn0570-7358-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/96963-
dc.descriptionArdeola 60(2):291-304. 2013es_ES
dc.description.abstractDisturbance and predation risks from terrestrial animals decline the higher up the nest sites selected by birds that nest in wall cavities are located. Terrestrial predators can also negate the protective quality of higher nesting sites by approaching from above in walls. It is unknown how terrestrial predation risks from below and above walls determine nest site selection in cavity-nesting species. In relation to this situation, we describe nest-site selection in common swifts Apus apus in the medieval city walls of Ávila, Spain. We recorded the entry size, hole depth and the horizontal and vertical positions of cavities. Most cavities were empty despite their size being suitable for nesting. Swifts nested in cavities at least 12 cm deep and with an entry between 3.5 cm and 13 cm wide. Nests were 3.5 m above the ground and 1.7 m below the top of the wall, although there were suitable cavities at the lower and higher extremes, respectively. Higher predation risks and disturbances could explain why suitable cavities were empty at lower and higher heights. The distances to the ground and to the top of the wall, as well as the distance to the nearest corner, accounted for about one-tenth of the probability that a cavity was used for nesting. Our data do not indicate a possible reason for nesting near corners, but weather is an obvious candidate.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSociedad Española de Ornitologíaes_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccessen_EN
dc.subjectApus apuses_ES
dc.subjectCastlees_ES
dc.subjectCavity nestinges_ES
dc.subjectCommon swiftes_ES
dc.subjectvencejoes_ES
dc.subjectnest selectiones_ES
dc.titleHole selection by nesting swifts in medieval city-walls of central Spaines_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.13157/arla.60.2.2013.291-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13157/arla.60.2.2013.291es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn2341-0825-
dc.embargo.terms2015-10-01es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (MNCN) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Corrales Ardeola60 p291 2013.pdf563,32 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on 26-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on 19-feb-2024

Page view(s)

736
checked on 27-mar-2024

Download(s)

1.122
checked on 27-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.