English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/96210
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Lethal interactions among vertebrate top predators: a review of concepts, assumptions and terminology

AuthorsLourenço, Rui; Penteriani, Vincenzo ; Rabaça, Joaõ E.; Kopimäki, Erkkik
KeywordsGuild
Interference competition
Interspecific competitive killing
Intraguild predation
Lethal interactions
Mesopredator release
Superpredation
Issue Date2014
PublisherCambridge Philosofical Society
CitationBiological reviews, 89(2): 270-283 (2014)
AbstractLethal interactions among large vertebrate predators have long interested researchers because of ecological and conservation issues. Research focusing on lethal interactions among vertebrate top predators has used several terms with a broad sense, and also introduced new terminology. We analysed the published literature with reference to the main underlying concepts and the use of terminology and its ecological context. The most frequently used terms in the literature were ‘predation’, ‘intraguild predation’, ‘interference competition’, and ‘interspecific killing’. Most studies presented evidence of the killing of the victim (77%), but information regarding its consumption was not given in 48% of cases. More than half of the analysed studies (56%) had no solid information on the degree of competition between interacting species. By reviewing definitions and their underlying assumptions, we demonstrate that lethal interactions among large vertebrate predators could be designated using four terms—‘predation’, ‘intraguild predation’, ‘interspecific competitive killing’, and ‘superpredation’—without the need to employ additional terminology that may increase confusion and misuse. For a correct framework of these lethal interactions it is critical to assess if the kill is consumed, if the victim is indeed a competitor of the killer, and if the prey is a high-order predator. However, these elements of the framework are simultaneously the most common constraints to studies of lethal interactions, since they often require a great effort to obtain. The proper use of terms and concepts is fundamental to understanding the causes behind lethal interactions and, ultimately, what is actually happening in these complex interactions.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/brv.12054
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/96210
DOI10.1111/brv.12054
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lourenco_with_editor_changes.docarticulo151,5 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Figure 1 L2.pdffigure 1909,56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Figure 2 evidences.pdfFigure 21,49 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Figure 3 terminology.pdfFigure 31,69 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.